It is undeniable truth that luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life hinder from developing into strong and independent individual; Perhaps this fact is not always true. The invention of new technologies has blessed humans with all the luxuries which have made mankind’s life more convenient and easy. These luxuries are like tools which shape our life. The use of the tool is entirely in the hands of human. Thus, in my opinion it is we humans who are in-charge of our life. It’s in our hand whether we use these luxuries to enervate us or to invigorate the passion to access more luxury by working day-in and day-out.
We human are very adaptable creatures. We adapt to new technological invention which provides us luxury and convenience very easily which have considerable effect in shaping our life. The outcome may be positive or negative! For example, if two subjects are given equal amount of resources like high speed internet, a very sophisticated mode of transport with all inbuilt facilities , palatial house to live .etc. Subject 1 may make the wise and optimized use of all the resources and make his life fast and be more compatible with the pace of the modern era. To elaborate, he/she can make use of high speed internet to work on new projects, nourish his/her knowledge & get all virtual things handy. On the other hand, subject 2 may use of all these things for entertainment and showing off purpose thus making his/her life aimless.
Access to luxuries things may enlighten the thought in one’s mind to enjoy more sophisticated and urbane luxuries. To achieve this goal the person works with more passion and vigor. In short, the initial access to luxury may make person more diligent and hardworking person. My parents gifted me a luxurious sports bike two year’s back on achieving 75% in 3rd year of my Engineering studies. This provoked me to work more hard and achieve 80% in my final year. Thus, the luxuries and conveniences may actually make us more successful person.
Luxuries and conveniences are the derivatives of modern technology. These are just the tools made to make our life easier not to make our life pathetic. It’s completely on the psyche of user of the these tools ; Whether these tools hones his life or make it blunt and meaningless.
- In this age of intensive media coverage, it is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero. 50
- Humans arrived in the Kaliko Islands about 7,000 years ago, and within 3,000 years most of the large mammal species that had lived in the forests of the Kaliko Islands had become extinct. Yet humans cannot have been a factor in the species' extinctions, b 50
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 50
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In dev 50
- "Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Central Plaza store owners believe that the decrease in their business is due to the numb 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 383, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...of transport with all inbuilt facilities , palatial house to live .etc. Subject 1 ...
^^
Line 3, column 408, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...uilt facilities , palatial house to live .etc. Subject 1 may make the wise and opt...
^^
Line 3, column 669, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... new projects, nourish his her knowledge get all virtual things handy. On the oth...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, if, may, so, thus, for example, in short, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1917.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 400.0 442.535393258 90% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7925 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65256840731 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.4975 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.831293683 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2857142857 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0476190476 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150361559487 0.243740707755 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551551430099 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628325142698 0.0758088955206 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0988342887004 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649775153073 0.0667264976115 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.