Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
You should write at least 250 words.
Putting more sports facilities are the solutions proposed from the experts in order to raise quality of life of society. Nonetheless, others argue that it is expected to produce little or no significance in raising public health. Despite this, there are proofs which support the expected effect of adding sports facilities.
It is inevitable that the modern society which has spoiled our daily routines, has laziness planted in their mind, resulting in less motivation to use sports facilities. It is reported in some places like United States, people do not really often work out and do not really exercise properly. People who travel everyday by car will experience laziness to do daily jogging or to go to the gym, even they have cheap or free access to sophisticated gym. Briefly, it is not entirely wrong to judge the laziness in doing sports as the main cause to prevent public health’s raise.
People who are too lazy to exercise are a lot, but they who are motivated by free or cheap access to sports facilities are much more. It is reported that many sports facilities which have the price cut, increase the interest of nearby people in doing sports, as well as adding more sports facilities. Consequently, the quality of life which including the average life expectancy and the fall of diseases incidents such as hypertension, is raised. Thus, there is a clear correlation between the increasing number of sports facilities and the rising quality of life of society.
We can conclude that adding sports facilities will result in a certain effect in raising people’s health, although there are parts of society who do not really enjoy using sports facilities because of their nature in being lazy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-19 | Amila Priynatha | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | Leeinho | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | MHT | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | Gholamirayaneh | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | junjunh | 78 | view |
- Below is a map of the city of Brandfield. City planners have decided to build a new shopping mall for the area, and two sites, S1 and S2 have been proposed.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where r 73
- The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The Drawbacks To The Use Of Nuclear Power Mean That It Is Not A Long Lasting Solution To The Problem Of Meeting Ever-increasing Energy Needs 70
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego, California and the rest of the world. 74
- The graphs show figures relating to hours worked and stress levels amongst professionals in eight groups. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, but, consequently, if, nonetheless, really, so, thus, well, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04195804196 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68639801866 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527972027972 0.561755894193 94% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0400564434 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.166666667 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183748053682 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754273703423 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514576835216 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119828453075 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0307136736961 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.