percentage of mobile phones owners using various mobile phone features.
Given is a table illustrating the percentage of people using different various functions of their mobile phone during the period from 2006 to 2010.
It is evident from the information supplied that making calls was by far the most primary reason why people used their mobile phone.
To specify, almost 100% of people using mobile phone to make calls in both years. The second popular function was sending and receiving text messages with over 73%, which was ahead of taking photos at 66%.
Searching the internet began gaining popularity from 41% in 2008 to 73% in 2010. The similar trend also took place in recording video, increasing from 9% to a staggering of 35% in 2010. Besides, at the same time, the percentage of playing music doubled from 12% to 26% during the period. By contrast, from 17% in 2006, the function of playing games rose dramatically to 42%, however, after that, there was a mere of 1% decline in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-29 | trpg143 | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | view | |
| 2024-11-22 | trpg143 | 73 | view |
- it is not uncommon that children are required to obey the rule of their parents and teachers. some people are worried that too much control over children will not prepare them well for their adult life. discuss both views and give your opinion. 67
- some people claim that secondary school should study international news as one of their subjects in secondary school. Others believe that such thing just wastes a lot of time. Discuss 89
- the line graph shows changes in the consumption of meat from 1955 to 2012. 84
- many parents go to work in other countries and take family with them. The advantages and disadvantages 78
- it is more important for children to learn about local history than world history To what extent do you agree or disagree 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 776.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8198757764 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40278762531 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645962732919 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 219.6 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.2385493838 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.0 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231224429799 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109816241126 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13521453198 0.0843802449381 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183443265987 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115631177588 0.0819641961636 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.