Some people think that human needs for farmland, house, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. DO you agree or disagree with this point of view?
There are two attitude about using land; some people prefer to use it as human needs such as farm, factory, house, etc. While others believe that we need use these lands for protecting endanger animals from extinct. In my point of view, we have to pay attention to these animals and protect them. This essay will support this idea by presenting some reasons in following reasons.
First of all, ecosystem will effect adversely by extinction of any animal or vegetable. Since, ecosystem is composed of different kind of species which have chain relation with each other, so any changes in this equation will leads to severe catastrophic. One of the most significant demerits of animals extinction is that their all benefits will gone too, therefore, we will face with lack of sources for future. Moreover, next generation (our children) will deprive of observing and enjoying them. Panda, for instance, is one of the endanger animal. Government of China spent millions dollars to rescue them and save from danger. But if they exhibited, next human generation would not see them in real world and touch them. Thy will just watch them in television and old documentary movies. By vanishing animals, the culture which is related to them will destroy and vanish either.
Furthermore, protect of endanger species have financially advantages. To recreate a species can be so much expensive. According to the recent researches which was done by Oxford biology institution (OBI), recreating of animals is possible by genetic engineering, but it is so expensive and is not beneficial. Whereas, we need to spend less money for saving them from extinct. In addition, saving land for endanger animals also will restrict human from destroying nature and protect himself from danger.
In conclusion, personally, I agree with saving land for endanger animals. I mentioned some reasons and indicated some disadvantages of extinct these animals to support my idea.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | Dimitrina | 60 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | Manu2525 | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | bishoy | 76 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | MOHD ARAFAT | 76 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | MOHD ARAFAT | 76 | view |
- Some people prefer to work for large company. Others prefer to work for small company. Which would you prefer? 70
- Some people think that they can learn better by themselves than with a teacher. Others think that it is always better to have a teacher. Which do you prefer? 76
- describe your personality 60
- fake 5 3
- Is it better to enjoy your money when you earn it or is it better to save your money for some time in the future? 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 30, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
... reasons. First of all, ecosystem will effect adversely by extinction of any animal o...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 226, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'lead'
Suggestion: lead
...r, so any changes in this equation will leads to severe catastrophic. One of the most...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 347, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[3]
Message: Did you mean 'go' or 'be gone'?
Suggestion: go; be gone
...inction is that their all benefits will gone too, therefore, we will face with lack ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 529, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ng them. Panda, for instance, is one of the endanger animal. Government of China spent milli...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, whereas, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 316.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16455696203 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69074446061 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598101265823 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8863118243 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.6 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 5.45110844103 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236886057259 0.236089414692 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774448816586 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.086306814753 0.0737576698707 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176915831971 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706711234984 0.0645574589148 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.