The graph on the right gives information on wages of Somecountry over a ten-year period.
The line graph demonstrates the percentage of expansion rate of salary in Somecountry from 1993 to 2003. It can be clearly seen that year 1998 recorded the highest growth while the lowest happened in 2002.
According to the graph, among the year of 1993 to 1997, the salary rate commenced at 2% in 1993 and doubled over the next year. It was slightly declining by 1% in 1995 but the figure remained in 1996. Also, there was a minimal increase in the growth rate of compensation in 1997 with 4%.
The peak value registered in 1998 with 6% and it was remarkably falling in 1999 but was raised in the next year. On the contrary, there was a significant drop in 2001 whereas, 2002 showed the lowest figure (about 1%). A sudden increase was then occurred in 2003.
To sum up, the figures for most years are relatively uniform and change from 1 to 4% , with rare exceptions such as the year 1998.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-13 | wardiati | 73 | view |
| 2019-03-09 | observer1998 | 78 | view |
| 2019-01-31 | Jayaprakash | 67 | view |
| 2017-07-20 | verunenka68 | 78 | view |
| 2016-12-09 | KAREN FABRO | 73 | view |
- The graph on the right shows how prices of high-tech gadgets changed over time in Somecountry. 33
- The graph below describes rainfall statistics for some country 86
- The graph on the right shows the way people of Somecountry invested their money during the year 2001-2006. 67
- The graph on the right shows annual water usage (in millions of cubic meters) by industry in Somecountry. 73
- The graph on the right describes average house prices in Sometown in 2005. 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 85, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...latively uniform and change from 1 to 4% , with rare exceptions such as the year 1...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, whereas, while, such as, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 734.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50306748466 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43881096627 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613496932515 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 206.1 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.4955818007 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.5555555556 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.44444444444 5.23603664747 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129557239247 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501559483064 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572302109865 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0824162605249 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349560625207 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.52 11.4140731707 75% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.