frog decline
The article discusses a fascination topic pertaining to decline in frog population and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that none of these solution are practical and real factors and opposes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading passage mentions that dwindle on frog due to pesticides which is chemical to protect insects harming crops. In contrary, the professor provides information that diminishing usage of pesticides is not economically practical owing to farmers would lose competition among other farmers in diverse area. Clearly, a disparity exist between the article and the evidence exhibited by the professor. As a result, we can safely assume that, this method is not core solution to cease the decrease on the frog population.
Second, reading passage pushes forth the idea that fungus play as an important role in decline of frog owing to spread of fungus induces to thicken the skin. Nonetheless, the professor contends this application of treatment is almost impossible to each of frog. Above all, this method does not prevent the frogs from spreading fungus to offspring. Consequently, we can argue that indeed the claim made in the reading is unsubstantiated.
Finally, the article posits that their natural habitat are threatened and it lead to extinction. The professor refutes this point by explaining that even protection of lakes as well as marshes are quite good idea, they do not have impact on frogs. According to the professor, key issue is global warming what give rise to decline on the frog.
In summary, while both the reading and writing provide interesting information with regard to decline of frogs and protection, a significant amount of evidence support that the lecture has presented more legitimate and tangible grounds. Therefore, the reading passage fails to justify the claim towards stand point of the professor.
- Populations of the yellow cedar, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, have been steadily declining for more than a century now, since about 1880. Scientists have advanced several hypotheses to explain this decline.One hypothesis 85
- permanent human being on the venus 81
- electronic medical record storage 86
- The article discusses a fascinating topic pertaining to type of working schedules and provides few reasons of support. However, the professor explain that it has some negative effect and opposes each of the author's reasons. 3
- Some parent offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school Do you think this is a good idea?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this solution' or 'these solutions'?
Suggestion: this solution; these solutions
...er, the professor explains that none of these solution are practical and real factors and oppo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'leads'?
Suggestion: leads
...r natural habitat are threatened and it lead to extinction. The professor refutes th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, however, if, nonetheless, second, so, therefore, well, while, in summary, as a result, as well as, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.01324503311 299% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1611.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 302.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33443708609 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8008254217 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 145.348785872 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582781456954 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 419.366225166 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4211969353 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.4 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1333333333 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53333333333 7.06452816374 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317097241041 0.272083759551 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103075451819 0.0996497079465 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112419380645 0.0662205650399 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18000669668 0.162205337803 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495635883799 0.0443174109184 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 63.6247240618 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.