Although science and technology are still improving people`s life, there will be not any more effects. Do you agree or disagree?
It is astonishing how mankind has been changed form the time of emerging. At all times people were inspired to create something new. Nothing can stop the progress on our planet in order to develop. I personally disagree with the statement, that there will be no more effects on people`s life through technological and scientific discoveries. There are a few reasons why I feel this way.
One of the reasons is that there is a myriad of questions left behind. Seeking for answers by humans will likely to bring over new knowledge, which is undoubtedly will affect people`s life marvelously. For example, people still are not aware of how to solve some crucial problems, such as treatment of certain diseases. If scientists find ways to cure AIDS and cancer, tremendous amount of humans will obtain a chance to overcome the illnesses and live happy life. Despite of existence of scores of medical laboratories and research centers, more discoveries are needed to reveal secrets of dealing with the mortal sicknesses. To that end, people will look for ways to enhance intelligence and improve life.
Another reason is that evolution is the natural process, which pushes humans for centuries to develop. This natural force will never cease and therefore, will bring even more discoveries in order to make people satisfy with daily duties. Indeed, if there had been no evolutionary process, people would have still used primitive tools or horses in agriculture. But the natural desire to live easier and wealthier, encouraged them to invent tractors and combines to save time during the harvest and devote it to other activities. Although today modern equipment enables people to spend much less time working on a field than it was one hundred years ago, they will aim to ameliorate it in higher degree. Because of that, mankind will continue to be affected.
To sum it up, I feel that there are much more effects could be anticipated, resulted from scientific and technological discoveries. This is because humans still have scores of questions without answers and evolution will continuously force them to improve life. All things considered it is reasonable to assume that the progress is not over.
- It is sometimes said that borrowing money from a friend can harm or damage the friendship. Do you agree? Why or why not? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer. 60
- Some people prefer to live in the countryside or in a small town. Others prefer to live in a big city. Which place would you prefer to live in? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 63
- Many people have a close relationships with their pets. These people trat their birds, cats, or other animals like members of their family. In your opinion, are such relationships good? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 70
- It has recently been announced that a new high school may be built in your community. Do you support or oppose this plan? Why? Use specific reasons and details in your answer. 65
- A company is going to give some money either to support the arts or to protect the environment. Which do you think the company should choose? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 393, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... are a few reasons why I feel this way. One of the reasons is that there is a my...
^^^
Line 4, column 342, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o assume that the progress is not over.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, still, therefore, for example, i feel, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1849.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 363.0 407.700716846 89% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09366391185 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77043508883 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567493112948 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8655239524 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.45 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.15 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.45110844103 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28178941067 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748589761124 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0811030979665 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173327420508 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0201662128127 0.0645574589148 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.