Some people say that computers have made life easier and more convenient. Other people say that computers have made life more complex and stressful. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Computers are a great technological advance. Some people, called technophiles, use computers regularly and greatly benefit from them. Others- technophobes think that computers have been destroying our society. In my opinion, computers are advantageous for the human being because they have simplified people`s life. There are a few reasons why I hold this stance.
First of all, computers save priceless time. Nowadays, people live extremely busy lives, especially those, who residue big cities. Residents of megapolises spend at least two hours a day on commuting. These people always lack a free time. Through computers connected to the Internet, the people can shop for clothes or order food in a restaurant right from their homes. It saves them a lot of time which they can devote to an active or a passive rest. If people had some extra time to relax, they would be less stressful and more healthy. Despite the opinion of technophobes that computers make people lazy, the technology actually provides mankind with an extra time for enjoyable activities.
Secondly, computers have a great capacity. A tremendous amount of information can be stored in the computers. Besides, the information in the computers is highly organized, which helps to access it very easily. This advantage is crucial for people who work with plenty of documents, such as accounters. When people can store information in computers, they do not have to keep a variety of dusty books on shelves in their offices and homes. Although these days, some individuals continue keeping printed books, most of the modern people save all of their documentation, photos, and videos on the hard disks of the computers. To that end, computers are extremely compact storages, where people can keep all their work and personal information.
To conclude, I believe that computers have made life easier and convenient. This is because they help people to extend leisure time and to store a myriad of information. Therefore, the benefit of computers for modern society is obvious.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-22 | mary24 | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-08 | omega93 | 60 | view |
| 2019-10-30 | thakannv | 76 | view |
| 2019-09-26 | SHARMIN AKTAR | 60 | view |
| 2019-08-20 | Bibek Regmi | 78 | view |
- A person you know is planning to move to your town or city What do you think this person would like and dislike about living in your town or city Why Use specific reasons and details to develop your essay 92
- Some people believe that a college or university education should be available to all students Others believe that higher education should be available only to good students Discuss these views Which view do you agree with Explain why 88
- Many people have a close relationships with their pets These people trat their birds cats or other animals like members of their family In your opinion are such relationships good Why or why not Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 57
- Although science and technology are still improving people`s life, there will be not any more effects. Do you agree or disagree? 80
- Nowadays, food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 14, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s why I hold this stance. First of all, computers save priceless time. Nowadays,...
^^
Line 2, column 108, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a residue'.
Suggestion: who is a residue
...extremely busy lives, especially those, who residue big cities. Residents of megapolises sp...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, at least, such as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1719.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 329.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22492401216 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84874274447 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586626139818 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 3.0 0.994623655914 302% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.6317184654 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.7391304348 100.406767564 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3043478261 20.6045352989 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73913043478 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286007438864 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.086393224414 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0785649495069 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196585929651 0.150856017488 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584337602965 0.0645574589148 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.4 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 10.002688172 45% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.