do you agree or disagree? children should spend most of their time on studying and playing and they shouldn't be required to help family with household chores, such as cleaning and cooking.
dom inclined to refute this suggestion. In my perspective, the advantages that these types of activities bring to children will appear in their current and future life. My arguments and reasons are listed below which will strengthen my point of view:
To begin with, it is axiomatic that children will have enough time in the future for learning inner task in the house; however the first advantage of doing household chores is that the children learn to schedule their time and duties. But how? There are the families who divide the labors of house among the members of family. In such regular families, children have a chance to reinforce their management skill. Children need to handle their daily program include the studying, playing and going to out and list goes on.
The second reason why I refute this idea lies in the fact that such activities probably seem to be miscellaneous and useless; however they are analogous powerful tools in improving children's personality. When the parents require children to do several tasks related with house, in fact they show a reliance feeling to their children and the self-confidence feeling in children will be encouraged. For instance, when I was a kid, my mother was a nurse and I was forced to do some tasks in our home; as a result I could obtain an incredible feeling in the school compared with my classmates because I was trying to help them in necessary circumstances.
Moreover, there is a bit of different point here. After doing these types of activities, this opportunity will be created for children to gain new experiences because cooking, cleaning or sweeping can set children under pressure; consequently an interdependent person will be revealed.
By taking all above mentioned arguments, this conclusion could be drawn that on the one hand the house chores can cause children to acquire self-confidence and diverse experiences in their life; on the other hand they will be able to improve children’s potential planning.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-22 | Rustin_Panda | 76 | view |
| 2020-08-28 | zachary_dong | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-20 | fofty | 70 | view |
| 2019-02-13 | joyce05 | 77 | view |
| 2019-01-23 | tenseitsai | 89 | view |
- which one is better for one student:a major which finishes in short timea major with long period of time 90
- tpo25 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct. 84
- Tpo15 85
- tpo32 88
Comments
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
No. of Words: 330 350
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 25 in 30
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 330 350
No. of Characters: 1624 1500
No. of Different Words: 187 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.262 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.921 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.751 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 113 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 88 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 64 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 36 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.571 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 14.376 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.571 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.31 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.577 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.061 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Dom
dom inclined to refute this suggestion. In ...
^^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... children's potential planning.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, then, as for, for instance, in fact, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1690.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 330.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12121212121 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86134428071 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569696969697 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.994623655914 201% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences, or put a space between two sentences.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => OK
Sentence length SD: 96.6718355416 48.9658058833 197% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.833333333 100.406767564 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 20.6045352989 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9166666667 5.45110844103 219% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257497322187 0.236089414692 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783818319006 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590671325202 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132028246805 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579877892298 0.0645574589148 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 58.1214874552 76% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.