Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is a dispute about the universities should accept the same number of male and female students in a categorical subject. I believe that it is unnecessary to ask universities set up the standard of an equal number of each gender.
The discrimination of the roles of genders is much minimum than before. As the advanced consensus about the quality of each gender, both male and female have the right to choose what they want to major in universities. Back in the past decades, there truly existed the forbiddance for the nursing care schools only open to girls. It is more common that some male would study nursing care and some female would work hard to be an engineer. Under this scenario, universities indeed widen the limits of each subject for students’ equal opportunities. To ensure gender equality, some advocators claim that universities should accept the same number of male and female students in each subject.
However, I consider that there is no need to compel universities to accept the equal number of each gender. There is a significant fact that the subjects what each gender is good at are different. According to the statistics, males are more sensitive to mathematics than females, and females usually have talents toward literature. It is not nonsense that the male engineers are always more than the females. Based on this information, it would cause problems if universities set up the rule that each subject should accept an equal number of male and female. It is possible that some prominent students cannot enter the good universities. Moreover, some inferior students could even study in these universities because of the rule.
In conclusion, the discrimination of gender is now unacceptable. Nevertheless, without setting the limit to require the same number of male and female, it would be really equal when universities free the boundary of gender.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-21 | tatadaigia | 22 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | Skhanuman1 | 11 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | wIsaac | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-18 | nguyen thi thu hien | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-18 | nguyen thi thu hien | 56 | view |
- The following appeared in a memo to the board of directors of Bargain Brand Cereals.One year ago we introduced our first product, Bargain Brand breakfast cereal. Our very low prices quickly drew many customers away from the top-selling cereal companies. A 50
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 58
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Balmer Island Gazette.On Balmer Island, where mopeds serve as a popular form of transportation, the population increases to 100,000 during the summer months. To reduce the number of accidents involvi 66
- It's generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for music and sport, and others are not. However, it's sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become good sports person or musician.Discuss the two ideas givin 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, nevertheless, really, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1587.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10289389068 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91614522592 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48231511254 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.2373773741 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.3529411765 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2941176471 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.64705882353 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347733306295 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123573597812 0.084324248473 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112741546803 0.0667982634062 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252198585263 0.151304729494 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0902945876147 0.056905535591 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.