Working three days a week for long hours or five days a week for shorter hours which one is better?
It has long been a controversy among my extended family that of the options of working three days a week for long hours or five days a week for shorter hours which one is more preferable. As far as I am concerned, answering to this question is imperative as it deals with one of the most important methods for living efficiently. Notwithstanding that those who hold the opposite view are partially reasonable, I would contend that working only three days a week for long hours is better compared to the other way.
The first reason that I should mention is that working three days a week would give us more time and comfort in weekends. For instance, when I was a kid, my father had a temporary job for a company for only three days a week; Those days are among the best days of my life as he spent so much time with me, such as traveling to nearby cities, watching sports and etc. After the completion of his mission in the company, he did not have enough time for the time-consumption hobbies.
The second reason for my propensity is that it is much better if we have to work another job to support our family. According to a research which was conducted by one of the most reputable universities in my country, people have two jobs on average due to low salaries. In this scenario, the residents of my country would love to work in a job with lower days as they can do another job. On the contrary, some people may argue that they can do their second job in afternoon. However, part jobs or non-primarily jobs are usually are in work time and by doing so they would miss their chance.
The last, but not the least, most people that I know including myself would like to get rid of their tasks in a job immediately compared to doing the task or project every day. A prime example from my own experience may shed some light to this point; during the days of my job as a teaching assistant in a university, I noticed that, it is more enjoyable to work hard to finish my project compared to only working in the so-called working hours. By doing that, I was able to save my time for more important things in my life such as enjoying a trip with my family to another country.
To conclude, considering the above reasons, it is more efficient and enjoyable to work harder in some certain days. However, Benjamin Franklin once said “Lost time is never found again”. We should spend our time close to our family and jobs are just ways to make money.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-01-08 | atlanta123 | 70 | view |
- Essay topics: Populations of the yellow cedar, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, have been steadily declining for more than a century now, since about 1880. Scientists have advanced several hypotheses to explain this decline. 80
- Some people believe that zoos serve useful functions. Other people believe that it is cruel and wrong to confine in zoos. Tell which point of view you agree with and explain why, using specific and reasons. 70
- Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. 70
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to so much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? 77
- A university plans to develop a new research center in your country. Some people want a center for business research. Other people want a center for research in agriculture. Which of these two kinds of research centers do you recommend for your country? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 358, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...eling to nearby cities, watching sports and etc. After the completion of his mission in ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 528, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
... jobs or non-primarily jobs are usually are in work time and by doing so they would...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, so, for instance, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2006.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 454.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.41850220264 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5415638987 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473568281938 0.524837075471 90% => OK
syllable_count: 632.7 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9851589149 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7058823529 20.6045352989 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.70588235294 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384300617077 0.236089414692 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128911472452 0.076458572812 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.179790421929 0.0737576698707 244% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234190081745 0.150856017488 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.236863441692 0.0645574589148 367% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 58.1214874552 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 10.9000537634 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.