The lecture and the reading both discuss the altruistic behavior inhuman and meerkat. While the reading states that meerkat guards it's group keeping itself in a great danger, the lecture refutes this, saying that it doesn't keep itself in a danger rather other group members are in great danger.
First of all, the reading claims that the meerkat that guards it's group always stay in hunger which is very altruistic behavior. However, the lecture argues that it has eating habit before standing a guard. Furthermore, the professor states that when it stands a guard, it is always full of stomach.
In addition, the reading makes the argument that the meerkat gives an alarm when hawk approach to it. It gets nothing but put itself in a great danger protecting other. The lecture counter's this point by stating that it rather keep in danger to other members. According to the professor, when it gives an alarm, other members gather together looking for food.
Lastly, the reading passage argues that human beings have an altruistic behavior for which they share food even with strangers as well. The reading says that when people are going to die, they donate their organs before their death which is an altruism. The lecture refutes this claims by pointing out, this donating behavior isn't completely altruistic behavior. Moreover, the professor says, these kinds of activities gives an appreciation and a feeling of self-worth.
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they answer the specific problems presented in the reading passage 3
- nnnnnnnnnnnnn 3
- painting 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Some people prefer to spend most of their time alone. Others like to be with friends most of the time. Do you prefer to spend your time alone or with friends? Use specific reasons to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...he lecture refutes this, saying that it doesnt keep itself in a danger rather other gr...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 326, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...by pointing out, this donating behavior isnt completely altruistic behavior. Moreove...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, lastly, look, moreover, so, well, while, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1199.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 236.0 270.72406181 87% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08050847458 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35301535689 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533898305085 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.116997792494 855% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1637199865 49.2860985944 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2307692308 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1538461538 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 7.06452816374 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150402291864 0.272083759551 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542271235391 0.0996497079465 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428141832349 0.0662205650399 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.090267807134 0.162205337803 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428734756738 0.0443174109184 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.