TPO 45
The reading passage claims that there are many skeptics that support these fossil structure did not resemble bee nests. The lecturer casts serious doubt on this claim by presenting some counter-arguments and examples. She believes that none these proofs are convincing.
At the first place, she contends that the bees can preserve fossil by sticky materials which some trees can make also, these kind of trees are really rare at that time, thus it is not good evidence to support that bees did not exist 200 million years ago. This, however, is contradicted to the reading passage argues that no fossil remains of actual bees have ever been found on that date additionally the earliest one were detected 100 million years ago.
On the other hand, it is noted in the passage that absence of flowering plants in that period can determine that it is unlikely bees could have existed before that time. In contrast, the lecturer clearly states that it is true that 200 million years ago, there were not any flowering plant, though, bees can feed from non-flower plant moreover after appearing of flowering plants, t was the evolution time for bees which could change their taste in order to attract to flowering plants, therefore it is not persuasive proof for rejecting of bees at that time.
Finally, the speaker points out that by some chemical advance which use to detect something from fossils, we can realize that they use the same material which is waterproof for protecting their nest chambers like modern bees. Nonetheless the text asserts that because of lacking of the finer details of bee's nest we cannot guarantee that this structure relevant to bee nests.
- TPO-44 - Independent Writing Task Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing th 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO 24 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives.Use specific reasons and examples to 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 70, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this fossil' or 'these fossils'?
Suggestion: this fossil; these fossils
...at there are many skeptics that support these fossil structure did not resemble bee nests. T...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...terials which some trees can make also, these kind of trees are really rare at that time, ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 69, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...out that by some chemical advance which use to detect something from fossils, we ca...
^^^
Line 7, column 227, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nonetheless,
...g their nest chambers like modern bees. Nonetheless the text asserts that because of lackin...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, moreover, nonetheless, really, so, therefore, thus, in contrast, kind of, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 7.30242825607 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 23.0 12.0772626932 190% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1395.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 281.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96441281139 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40695180744 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565836298932 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 21.2450331126 146% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 94.224318635 49.2860985944 191% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.0 110.228320801 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.2222222222 21.698381199 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.8888888889 7.06452816374 211% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0864236930046 0.272083759551 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0378159974772 0.0996497079465 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0169896122398 0.0662205650399 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0544528729644 0.162205337803 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00533879381305 0.0443174109184 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.3589403974 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 53.8541721854 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.08 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.498013245 137% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.