The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of major university in 2012.
The bar chart depicts the ratio of male and females in the role of academic staff members, in the major universities in 2012. The spectacular feature of the chart is the immense difference in the proportion of males and females in Engineering.
As is observed from the graph, more than 50% of the females were employed in the arts while the remaining were males. However, Business included about 65% males and 35% females. Moreover, in Education, a ratio of female counterparts was significantly higher than the males.
Moving further, Engineering was extensively employed by the males which included only one-fifth of females. It is interesting to note that an equal number of males and females were worked in the medicine while the males surpass the females with 20% and 30% in Law and Science respectively.
All in all, Majority of staff members in academic field are males instead of females.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-07 | rm21co | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-17 | Bao Linh Le | 92 | view |
| 2019-01-16 | arfaat | 56 | view |
| 2018-10-19 | Rajansidhu | 91 | view |
| 2018-10-19 | Rajansidhu | 67 | view |
- The graph below compares figures for the production and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000 It also predicts figures for 2025 66
- The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university. 11
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world. 81
- Nowadays, children play less with others and this has an impact on their development.What are reasons for this?Does it have a good or bad effect on children? 84
- As water is a valuable resource, governments all over the world should control how much water their citizens use.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 756.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79256154811 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566666666667 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.2029742644 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31959395075 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134024897713 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110616614339 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198087852224 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0904157417325 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.