Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
One of the most difficult questions that are faced by governments of all countries is whether create new railroads or highways. Although some people are confident in the importance of building new rail lines, I would adhere to an opinion that roads for cars remain more efficient and convenient to date.
First and foremost, the major strength of the roadways is that they connect every building in a city. At the same time, it is still hard to imagine a vast web of the rail lines in a city centre. The explanation of it is rather obvious. If there is an accident on the road, the driver can easily choose another path. This pattern cannot be used for trains. Any little breakage will stop the traffic of the whole rail line.
What is more, there is another reason why highways should be a better choice than railroads. As is well known, roads help people to feel free. Drivers are not dependent on the schedule of the trains; they understand that it is their vehicle and they can manage it as they want. So, it can be said that newly constructed roads will help to develop the sense of freedom for the population. People will be more active and interested in the life of the society and even the country.
To sum up, I would like to underline that creation or renewal of the infrastructure is significant nowadays and, certainly, can be done in several ways. Nevertheless, I am sure that building new roads can enhance the standards of living of the society much better than constructing new railways.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Dungphung | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | BIBHU KALITA | 11 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | tranhien297 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | pateldhruv1708 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | geforce | 61 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, nevertheless, so, still, well, to sum up, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1245.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64552238806 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57012097597 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585820895522 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.8856142265 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8666666667 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0517728901436 0.244688304435 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0200945183959 0.084324248473 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0339319918918 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0289866754286 0.151304729494 19% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00944349944193 0.056905535591 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.0946893788 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 50.2224549098 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.39 12.4159519038 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.