the charge shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of air pollutants in four big cities in 2000
The given bar chart gives data about the daily smallest and largest amounts of SO2 and N2O which caused pollution in 4 different cities, namely Los Angeles, Calcutta, Beijing and Mexico City, in the year 2000. Overall, Mexico City was the place most contaminated by the two mentioned pollutants among the four cities.
In Los Angeles, the quantity of SO2 emitted into the atmosphere was lowest, with the minimum number of 2 micro-grams per m3 and the maximum number five times as much. The levels of N2O emission were much higher with the biggest figure reaching up to more than 100 micro-grams per m3 every day. Meanwhile, the environment in Mexico City was severely polluted by SO2 and N2O emission with the least of 80 and 113 micro-grams per m3 respectively.
Unlike Los Angeles and Mexico City, in Calcutta and Beijing, the amount of pollution caused by N2O was less that that caused by SO2. The maximum figures for SO2 emission were 59 micro-grams per m3 in Calcutta and 130 micro-grams per m3 in Beijing while the biggest numbers for N2O in these places were just above 50 micro-grams per m3.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-20 | Bennhehe | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | Bennhehe | 67 | view |
| 2022-10-07 | arsh wahid | 61 | view |
| 2022-10-07 | arsh wahid | 61 | view |
| 2022-10-07 | arsh wahid | 61 | view |
- The first chart shows the population of England and Wales between 1700 and 2000 The second chart gives information about the birth and death rate in the same countried in the same period 53
- In many parts of the world, children and teenagers are committing more crimes. Why is this happening? How should they by punished? 78
- The graph below shows the changes in UK birth rate of women in 6 different ages from 1973 to 2008 78
- The two column charts below show the percentage of food and other items bought by three European countries in 1998 and 2008 77
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999 74
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 915.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79057591623 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56224824867 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544502617801 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.7588293649 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.714285714 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2857142857 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.85714285714 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110117649387 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627665877992 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362902762524 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0854446187994 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468330667729 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.