Nowadays, companies put more emphases on social skills in the recruitment process. What extent do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

Nowadays, companies put more emphases on social skills in the recruitment process. What extent do you agree or disagree?

In today's competitive world, employers are considering and giving more importance to their recruitment process. Currently, there are noticeable changes have been witnessed in choosing skill set of the candidate during the recruitment process of many companies than earlier. Many companies put emphasis and hire people with the good social skill set for the success of the organization. My inclination supports the statement which can be explained with the following possible arguments.

Looking into the current competition in every industry, companies are insisting on hiring candidates who carry social skills like communication skill, interpersonal skill to get connected with the people around them easily. Having social skills like initiating the talk and take it further can help the employee to develop official and business relations easily which does not help only to grab the more business but also to create a friendly environment in the office. Moreover, creating good relations in the office can create the healthy environment around them which is the foremost requirement of any employee to work peacefully and delivering the outcome efficiently. Last but not the least, social skills help to develop internal bonding among the employees that can help the organization to have a more long term loyal employee for the development of the organization.

On the flipside, as it is rightly said that excess of anything is a poison, the over enthusiasm in using social skills can create problems for the organization.The employee can mingle a lot which can distract them from their task and there would be delays in work. Moreover, from the employer point of view, there would be possibilities of creation of employee union that can threat management to approve their inappropriate demands. For instance, strikes in organizations are the result of excessive bonding among the team.Finally, people can get good job offers through the business relations which can result in the loss of competent employees from the system.

All in all, the benefits of social skill set outweigh the impact of it if utilized and nurtured properly. Hence, I strongly believe that for any organization to be successful in the current competitive scenario, should emphasis on hiring people with social skill sets.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2017-02-08 bhumikasuryavanshi 73 view
Essays by user bhumikasuryavanshi :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 194, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding people'?
Suggestion: the surrounding people
...terpersonal skill to get connected with the people around them easily. Having social skills like initi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 161, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...an create problems for the organization.The employee can mingle a lot which can dis...
^^^
Line 5, column 525, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Finally
...ult of excessive bonding among the team.Finally, people can get good job offers through...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, if, look, moreover, so, thus, for instance

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1968.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4364640884 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92612771002 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513812154696 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 592.2 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.6535078212 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.384615385 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8461538462 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30769230769 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161287259149 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704007151288 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572564637084 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113437464874 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681538047001 0.056905535591 120% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.