Most large companies nowadays operate multi-nationally. To what extent do multinational companies have responsibility toward local communities in which they operate.
It is true that a vast majority of transnational corporations have gained popularity in the new era. These companie, therefore, should be responsible for not only environmental but also social-related prolems in countries where they have operated.
On the one hand, there is no point in denying that international companies which have set up branches in many nations should bear the responsibility forwards environment where they operate companies. Especially with those firms have the production lines that produce numerous environmentally harmful industrial waste such as oil or steel manufactering factories. These large worldwide enterprises, therefore, must install waste treatment systems to address waste, either biodegradable or non-biodegradable, prior to discharging directly into environment. Otherwise, they would inevitably have encountered public opinions as well as severe punishment from state governments where they disposed of these waste. Consequently, the more environmetal issues they take into account, the better public image they could foster, the more success they could achieve.
Apart from the environmentally responsible manners, those international corporations should also be liable for social issues of the nations they have operated. Firstly, they should create more job opportunities, whereby the unemployment could be coped with and be no longer a headache for the host nations, especially in developing countries like Vietnam. Samsung, for example, has provided a variety of jobs for Vietnamese inhabitants, ranging from specialists to electronic workers with lower educational degree. Moreover, they could also take part in philanthropic actions such as providing humanitarian relief to severe flooding regions or underprivileged families.
In conclusion, I believe that giant corporations should hold the responsibility for both social and environmental aspects in countries, where they set up.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-24 | haihaihai | 78 | view |
| 2020-04-27 | Duy Dr.Diago Tran | view | |
| 2017-02-10 | kingnight153 | 84 | view |
| 2017-02-10 | kingnight153 | 61 | view |
- The two column charts below show the percentage of food and other items bought by three European countries in 1998 and 2008. 61
- The chart below shows numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled (PMT) by transportation type in 2002 78
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999 74
- Some argue that all young children should be required to stay with full-time education until they are at least 18 years old. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- The charts below give information on the ages of people when they got married in one particular country in 1996 and 2008 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, moreover, so, therefore, well, apart from, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.05818181818 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.43137492622 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629090909091 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.5412248466 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 138.833333333 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9166666667 7.06120827912 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145959802211 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569550573696 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474498996879 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0889342878336 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439733498319 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 50.2224549098 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.16 12.4159519038 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.41 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.