The figures illustrate the quantity of people who visited Ashdown Museum the year before and after refurbishment along with the surveys giving a breakdown about visitors satisfaction in a one year scale before and after changes.
As can be seen the number of visitors have seen a considerable increase after the refurbishment process reaching 92000 from 74000 in the year before. It is noticeable that while the number of visitors who voted for very satisfied soared from %15 to %35. The very dissatisfied category was declined by %5 from its origin of %10 during the year before changes.
Experiencing the same trend, the figure for dissatisfied visitors was faced a magnificent decrease from %40 to %15 during the year after constructions. However the increase for satisfied class was about %10 from %30 during the year before. The number of visitors who voted for no response, by the way, remained steady at %5 during these two periods.
Overall, as we can see the satisfaction factor as well as the number of visitors has risen after refurbishments.
- IN EDUCATION SYSTEM, ASSESSMENT THROUGH FORMAL WRITTEN EXAMINATION STILL VALID? 84
- Nowadays most people choose to throw away broken things instead of repairing them, and replace them with new ones. Why is this happening? What problems may it lead to? 81
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping etc. and whether you support them or not. 61
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping etc. and whether you support them or not. 85
- ANY RECENT INVENTION THAT YOU THINK PROVED BENEFICIAL OR DETRIMENTAL TO SOCIETY 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 153, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...15 during the year after constructions. However the increase for satisfied class was ab...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, well, while, as well as, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 888.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07428571429 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87351878436 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537142857143 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4615635016 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365762925323 0.215688989381 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162786482516 0.103423049105 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563249620931 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217703654325 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729044852241 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.