The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates per capita emissions of carbon dioxide of the four countries namely United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal. Generally speaking, United Kingdom and Sweden experienced the decreases while Italy and Portugal had the increases of carbon dioxide emissions per person during the time period of 1967-2007.
United Kingdom had the highest per person emissions of CO2; however, it had been gradually reducing from 10.8 metric tons down to 8.8 tons over 40 years. The second large amount of CO2 released by one person belong to Sweden at nearly 9 metrics tons in 1967, then reached its peak of over 10 metric tons in after ten years, and finally became rapidly fell to less than 6 metrics tons in 2007.
In contrast, Italy and Portugal had the same trend which began the low emissions at the beginning, then the amount of CO2 per person had been risen steadily. Italy had almost a double rise met Sweden’s emissions at 7 metric tons in 1987, then passed Sweden to be the second highest emissions at the end. Portugal had an extremely little amount of emissions which was 1 metric tons per person in 1967. However, the country eventually had the same amount of CO2 emissions per capita of Sweden which was 5.8 metric tons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-08 | Noah1997 | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-31 | ismlaydmr | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-11 | Mampee | 89 | view |
| 2019-08-26 | Sai sushma | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-23 | the_prisoner | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn the factsUse specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 67
- The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comp 67
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?What sort of punishment should parents and 56
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career, while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school.Discuss both views 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, second, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1043.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8738317757 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39606648424 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523364485981 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9342078829 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.375 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.75 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27051596968 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15714832015 0.103423049105 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0768927971749 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221542464942 0.15604864568 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105821809268 0.0819641961636 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.