The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph illustrates information how many British people donating money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 in percentage form.
There was a steady increase in number for ages 18-25 up to 36-50 in year 1990. Approximately 17% from 18-25 years of age donated to charity then increased to more than 40% for age 36-50. Moreover, same trend happened in 2010 but this time the increasing trend was up to 51-65 years old. A merely 5% came from 18-25 years old which is the lowest recorded percentage in 2010. The number increased to 40% thus making it the highest percentage in 2010 and it was under 51-65 years old.
On the other hand, a noticeable gradual decrease in percentage in 1990 from 51 years old up to 65 and above. In addition, the trend happened the same for the age 65 and above in year 2010.
In conclusion, the younger the age the lesser interest in donating money to charity and it shows that as the age gets older it also decreases the interest in participation in charity work.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-17 | Fenny Mahara | 61 | view |
| 2019-01-26 | damladogan | 11 | view |
| 2019-01-14 | MilanT | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-21 | peeradonn | 73 | view |
| 2018-10-12 | dutahi | 67 | view |
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 73
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists traveling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia's share of the Japanese tourist market.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. You should write at least 15 73
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing.Do you think the advantageous of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists traveling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia s share of the Japanese tourist market Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below You should write at least 150 44
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, moreover, so, then, thus, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 837.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54891304348 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47152378512 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516304347826 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6994706336 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.11111111111 5.23603664747 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269933852842 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131468743916 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.092131966859 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195993314745 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109224658217 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.11 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.