Some people think that it is good for a country’s culture to broadcast foreign films and TV show. Others,however think it is best to produce local films and shows. Discuss both views and give your opinions.
In recent decades, some foreign films and TV series are having substantial impacts on the local culture in a discernible way, rasing a question of ethnic codes. Although the proposal of importing more external films sould reasonable, I think the production of local ones would pay dividends.
On the one hand, There are a great number of reasons why the production local films and shows should be encouraged. First, Local films is proved to be an effective tool to impart the moral codes and traditional precepts on children. This means that they could distinguish what is right or wrong in their social norms, which remarkably preclude them from crime commission. Second, a constant exposure to the beauties of national cultural values and historical sites through some television series would be conducive to a higher degree of appreciation and awareness of maintenance in citizens. For example, many Vietnamese beauty spots are now being restored and well-preserved by the local citizens thanks to such national films and movie series about the natural beauty of Vietnam.
On the one hand, imported movies and TV series also bring several advantages to a local culture. First, By perceiving some lifestyles from overseas, a local government will detect the imperfections in their existing laws and therefore get amended to improve the living standards. For instance, Vietnamese citizens could freely interact with the international communities and voice their opinions about politics without the governmental censorship because Vietnam is open to new ideas of foreign films. In addition, An increase in foreign entertaining materials could associated with a higher level of interaction with outside cultures. This means that people would be less sensitive to the risk of culture shock when migrating or traveling abroad, which would make the assimilation into the new society easier.
In conclusion, focusing on foreign films and shows would do more harm than good. The local government should recognise the benefits of producing local materials to facilitate the diversity of national cultures.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-04-10 | grahamoneil | 84 | view |
| 2017-04-10 | grahamoneil | 84 | view |
- The price of a cup of coffee in six cities from 2010 to 2014 in Australia 57
- Celebrities make a very good living out of media attention and have chosen to live in the public spotlight. They have no right to complain when they feel the media are intruding on their privacy. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
- In some parts of the world it is increasingly popular to research the history of one's own family. Why do people want to do this? Is it a positive or negative development? 73
- Some people think the government should pay for healthcare and education but other people claim that it is the individual’s responsibility. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 67
- As the number of cars increases, more money has to be spent on road systems. Some people think the government should pay for this. Others, however, think that the user should cover the costs. Discuss and give your opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a discernible way" with adverb for "discernible"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ubstantial impacts on the local culture in a discernible way, rasing a question of ethnic codes. Alt...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 569, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'associate'
Suggestion: associate
...in foreign entertaining materials could associated with a higher level of interaction with...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1780.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42682926829 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86060754915 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588414634146 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8081136545 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.142857143 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220226962119 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757616621119 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051020074 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149668596542 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523414147589 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.