The table below gives information about spending on different advertisement methods of four car companies in UK in 2008.

Essay topics:

The table below gives information about spending on different advertisement methods of four car companies in UK in 2008.

The table compares expenditure on methods of advertisement in four car companies in the UK in 2008.

It is clear that every company mainly advertised through televisions while radio advertisements accounted for the least proportions.

The percentage of television ads of Lotus was 39.14%, ahead of Bentley with 36.91%, followed by 25.74% and 22.96% of Land Rover and MG respectively. In terms of web page ads, Lotus had the highest proportion with 25.15% as opposed to the lowest of 10,07% of MG. Additionally, Bentley matched Land Rover in spending on this advertisement method (equally 15%).

However, Land Rover dominated in magazine advertisements (23.02%), creating a dramatic gap to other companies ( 14.51% ofMG and equally 10% of Bentley and Lotus). When it comes to Newspaper ads, Lotus accounted for 9.51%, followed by 8% of Land Rover and MG, which was also twice as much as 4.43% of Bentley. Finally, MG took the leading role in spending on radio ads (7.98%) while others remained below 4.5%.

Votes
Average: 5.9 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-05-25 Rose Vu 22 view
2017-07-05 grahamoneil 59 view
Essays by user grahamoneil :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 108, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eating a dramatic gap to other companies 14.51% ofMG and equally 10% of Bentley a...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 843.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14024390244 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89291196189 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640243902439 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.9204410494 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.375 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202113557743 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114790406665 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.161054015816 0.0843802449381 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190277313228 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.191255726238 0.0819641961636 233% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.