The graph compares two age groups in terms of 10 factors they think affecting their performance at work.
It is clear that the majority of younger workers think chance to improve themself is the most important factor. Additionally, except for four factors, which is personal development, working environment, job security and promotion, two groups' opinions are relatively similar.
Over 90% of people aged between 18 and 30 years old believe that self development is the most important, while only 40% of 40-to 60-year-olds agree. Two other factors that popular among young workers are relaxed working environment and promotion prospects, at 80% each, compared to only around 40% of older workers think that they are important.
More than 60% people at work believe that team spirit and money affect work performance. Meanwhile, only 50% workers all ages think competent boss and job satisfaction are vital. It is interesting to note that while only 20% of people aged 45 to 60 consider job security as important to work performance, the proportion of young people concern about that factor is doubled, at 40%.
- Ielts writing task 1 11
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005 89
- IELTS Writing Task 1 - Example 9You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The chart shows British Emigration to selected destinations between 2004 and 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wh 78
- People who live in foreign countries should follow the traditions and customs. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 56
- Some people think it is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment for people who are already ill To what extent do you agree or disagree 75
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 940.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22222222222 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76450160713 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633333333333 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1856457634 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.5 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189679709211 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0900999121413 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054463352217 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128560310436 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054867707754 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.