Teachers should be evaluated by their students. Do you agree or disagree?
Since the early days of civilization, education has been exposed to a great deal of attention due to its eminent position in the society. The mankind has always been seeking ways to improve education by making changes in methodology, material and facilities. Nowadays, there is a negotiation about whether or not evaluating the teachers by students is going to help enhancing education and making learning process more efficient. I believe that teachers’ being evaluated by their students in any academic level is definitely beneficial. Some of the most important merits of this assessment are discussed later in this essay.
First of all, every professional needs to get some kind of feedback on how well he is doing his job. So evaluation is critical. Doing a periodical evaluation is necessary for example for an employer in order to have a better and more hardworking staff. In schools, universities or other academic institutions, students have close interaction with their professors. That means that the most efficient and tactful estimation can be done by the students. However, there is always the risk of students’ lying about their teachers’ behavior, knowledge or teaching abilities. But if they perceive that this evaluation will benefit them as well, they would be more objective and do the assessment with higher efficiency.
Another advantage of this evaluation is the competition that it induces between professors in a university. When professors of a university are being evaluated constantly and the results of this survey will go to the dean of that university, an incentive of being a better professor appears. The professors would emulate for a good reputation both among students and other fellow professors and also the dean. This probably may lead to more hardworking and knowledgeable professors and then to more academic achievements. This way, that specific university would gain a positive publicity, so there would be more donations and also more potential students applying there.
Finally, by this assessment the students feel that their university is respectful towards them. When a university asks its students to assess their professors, it means that to them, the students’opinionsstudents’ opinions are important and that they want their students to participate in the university’s events and destiny. Students also will respect their university and its staff. This way a peaceful and cordial environment is provided which can help teachers teach and students learn better.
Taking all the aforementioned into account, it can be concluded that the process of students evaluating their teachers, if done correctly, can accelerate students, teachers and even their university or school on the way to achieve their goals. Students can assess their teachers in many ways, such as doing a survey. Through this evaluation strengths and weaknesses are traced. It would be best if this evaluation process was not limited just to teachers and it extended to all parts of an academic institution, like facilities, staff, quality of extra-curriculum activities, etc. This way there would be a good chance to undo the mistakes and modify the ill conditions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 299, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
... Nowadays, there is a negotiation about whether or not evaluating the teachers by students is ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 367, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to enhance' or 'enhance'.
Suggestion: to enhance; enhance
...e teachers by students is going to help enhancing education and making learning process m...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 506, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
... help teachers teach and students learn better. Taking all the aforementioned into ...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 438, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... this evaluation process was not limited just to teachers and it extended to all ...
^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...istakes and modify the ill conditions.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, so, then, well, for example, kind of, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 13.8261648746 181% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.0752688172 272% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2728.0 1977.66487455 138% => OK
No of words: 502.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43426294821 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7334296765 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3773042547 2.67179642975 126% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498007968127 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 843.3 618.680645161 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.994623655914 201% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4125471067 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.923076923 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3076923077 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236112918779 0.236089414692 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762506207223 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630825112097 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153797038459 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.082137293528 0.0645574589148 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 86.8835125448 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.