Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading and listening passages have a conflict of opinions about theories of the source of the odd sound that is called Quackers was heard by sailors in Russian submarines. In the reading, the writer explains three theories about its source. While the lecturer claims that the passage state is not convincing.
First of all, the lecture makes it clear that Orca whales cannot produce this sound because they live on the surface of the ocean and this sound has heard the lower layer of the ocean. On the other hand, the writer argues that this animal makes this sound to attract a male and it is similar to those sounds which the submarine was detected.
Second, the professor points out that the giant squid is a better option to produce this sound. However, she believes that this sound was heard in 1960 and then it did not hear until 1980. At this time, the giant squids were living in the ocean so that it cannot a major source of the sound. By contrast, the speaker explains that this animal has soft bodies and intelligent and it can be the source of the sound because they have the ability to emit sound.
As a final point, the professor disagrees with the last theory, too. He suggests that the foreign submarine can produce this sound. Because they do not the technology of producing this sound. Also, this sound was very quickly. In contrast, the writer emphasizes that the third theory is very convincing and this technology is common between other countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-29 | Opak Pulup | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | NIMA SAEEDI | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | NIMA SAEEDI | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | NIMA SAEEDI | 80 | view |
| 2019-12-23 | NIMA SAEEDI | 80 | view |
- Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities. 60
- the decline of bird populations 73
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific solutions presented the reading passage. 73
- the sea otter 73
- Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 247, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...plains three theories about its source. While the lecturer claims that the passage st...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 132, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...reign submarine can produce this sound. Because they do not the technology of producing...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, second, so, then, third, while, in contrast, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1220.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 260.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69230769231 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22590982661 2.5805825403 86% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503846153846 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 358.2 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.4821126363 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.1428571429 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06452816374 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0591828967169 0.272083759551 22% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0270467827482 0.0996497079465 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0321516407119 0.0662205650399 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.040583093523 0.162205337803 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0183156993289 0.0443174109184 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.3589403974 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 53.8541721854 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.0289183223 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.2367328918 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.