Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Government in all countries have some visions and responsibilities. They are always doing something new to give prosperous future. Many governments have to focus only on economic development. Whereas, in my opinion, rise of economy nation is exceedingly important but this is not the paramount goal.
It is clear that economic growth acts a vital role in making a nation become better. The economy goes up which means per capita income increases, leading to a higher living standard. The superpowers all have the powerful economies that can make a lot of money which support to the country as a whole. For example, Taiwan had a significantly low average income before 1980; however, the economy had been rising 10% annually in average in more than 20 years. Eventually, the nation creatives better infrastructure, public transportation, health care for their citizens.
However, plenty of developed countries have achieved their economic destination but they are suffering from hostile relationship with other nations, epidemic disease, corruption, terrorism, crime rate and internal chaos. Thus, these type of countries gives economic satisfaction but they cannot ensure safety and better life style of natives. Moreover, industrialisation and success in trade ensure government stability in western sovereign states but ultimately they cannot amend environment is inextricably joint with health of citizens. For instance, six months ago, environment of Delhi, capital of India, was escalated by perilous particles such as CO2, CO and many more. Hence, epidemic diseases, specially related to lung, have been augmented.
Furthermore, crime rate is also major problem in developed realm especially against other country's passport holder. Recently, from news report, crime rates of The USA and Australia were on the peaked. Additionally, this scenario tends to hostile relation between countries. As a result, many time in history wars had been occur and indirectly effect on national economy. What is more, Terrorism and corruption are flourished owing to unbalanced development of different aspect of nation.
To conclude, commercial development is cornerstone of countries but other flank is also essential for giving better satisfaction to native inhabitant.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-04 | Wardiati Yusuf | 73 | view |
- It is more important for a building to serve a purpose than to look beautiful. Architects shouldn't worry about producing building as a work of art. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- The gap between rich and poor is growing What problems does this create What can be done to tackle them 84
- In many countries people are spending more time in their workplace Why is this Is this a negative or positive development 61
- In some countries at secondary at high school there may be two or three streams of studies academic or vocational What are the advantages of this to the students and the society of putting students at the two streams at the age of 15 86
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 288, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'many times'.
Suggestion: many times
...elation between countries. As a result, many time in history wars had been occur and indi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 323, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'occurred'.
Suggestion: occurred
...ult, many time in history wars had been occur and indirectly effect on national econo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus, whereas, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, in my opinion, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1933.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66862170088 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05290564612 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648093841642 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 622.8 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.9212356688 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.65 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.05 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141647730734 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0397771887391 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370631118209 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.081901370789 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507487369828 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.31 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.