write a letter recommendation for one of your students.
First I noticed Mr. Avinash Patil was during my lectures of Database Programming because he had eccentric interest in the practical applications of the subject. He pursued the classes with utmost sincerity and was keen to get a good grasp of the concepts. His involvement made the lectures interactive and fruitful. Because of his determination to studies, he was able to frequently secure good grades in many courses as evidenced by his transcripts. His GPAs put him in the distinctive students of that batch. This brings me to the evaluation process we had.
During the course we had three unit tests, to evaluate students’ knowledge on ongoing chapters, of which best scores from two tests would be used in final evaluations. On completion of each semester students had to face subjective examinations and comprehensive oral interviews (Viva voce). And I used to frequently participate as a member of evaluation panel to examining students’ ability to practically apply the taught concepts. Avinash had been able to consistently secure top grades in Comprehensive Viva and distinctive grades in unit tests and subjective examinations.
On the other hand, his achievements in extracurricular activities are worth mentioning. He used to discuss with me about various workshops he had attended and latest trends and technologies that were being used in the software industry, which he continues till date. He has also won two medals in badminton tournaments held on the university campus. For the fulfillment of degree every student is required to submit a project and his was an android application that found and marked public restrooms near the user’s location which I believe has been published, by one of his mentors from his internship, on the play store.
He strives to keep himself abreast of the recent research and advances in the field by reading various journals and attending various academic courses online. His ability to communicate and explain intricate concepts in an effortless way is impressive and makes him a good candidate for graduate studies.
With our discussions regarding his career plans, he wants to pursue MS in CS and as he mentioned, your program seems to be among his first preferences. And I would like to give my high recommendations to Mr. Avinash Patil for admission into your program.
- It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most comp 50
- You are a student at an English language school in Brighton and are living in private accommodation with other flat mates. You have not had hot water or heating for some time. The landlord’s workmen have tried to fix the problem but without success.Writ 89
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and su 66
- Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary school to universities, too much time spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills. Agree or disagree? 89
- You are going on a short course to a training college abroad. It is a college that you have not been to before.Write a letter to the accommodation officer. In your letter,give details of your course and your arrival/departure dateexplain your accommodatio 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 218, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an effortless way" with adverb for "effortless"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...municate and explain intricate concepts in an effortless way is impressive and makes him a good cand...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, regarding, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1974.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 377.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23607427056 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13347149765 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570291777188 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 613.8 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5268768303 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.666666667 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9444444444 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.21951772744 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0601996938633 0.243740707755 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0187688736849 0.0831039109588 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443853698963 0.0758088955206 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0417496051227 0.150359130593 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493386310805 0.0667264976115 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 100.480337079 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.