Some people think that good health is very important to every person, so medical services should not be run by profit-making companies.
Do the disadvantages of private health care outweigh the advantage?
In recent decades private health care has been attracting a great deal of media attention due to its substantial impacts on society. Although some proposed upsides appear to be reasonable, I think it bring more disadvantages overall.
On the one hand, there are some advantages that private health care offers to patients. First, Due to the competitive medical market, every privately-owned institution have a propensity to have the state-of-the-art medical facilities to attract more patients. This means that individuals with some serious conditions could be eradicated easily thanks to these devices, increasing their life expectancy. Second, some private medical insitutions usually render better services than any other other state-owned hospitals. For example, some private hospitals offer some outpatient services , post-operative consultations and hospital expenses reduction for low-income individuals, which are usually ignored by the state-owned hospitals.
On the one hand, private health care is fraught with some considerable downsides. First, Some private medical institutions are not without the existence of unqualified practitioners and untrained nurses. This is implied that the likelihood of medical irresponsibility and surgical malpractice is inevitable, culminating in some long-terms adverse impacts on patients’health. In addition, some profit-making purposes are invariably associated with the private hospitals’ preference for the treatment for high-end society. This could act as a contributor to the ignorance of gratifying treating demands of individuals living below the poverty line, leaving their diseases more serious.
In conclusion, private health care’ advantages are outweighed by its disadvantages in terms of medical malpractice and favoritism of wealthy class. The government should promote more state-owned medical institutions to bring more effective health care programmes to citizens.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-30 | anna103 | 89 | view |
| 2018-09-17 | trần thị thu thủy | 84 | view |
| 2018-09-17 | trần thị thu thủy | 92 | view |
- In recent years children have been given more freedom than in the past Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 70
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005. 90
- Rich countries should not employ skilled labour from poor countries as poor countries need the workers more Do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish Discuss both these views and give your 84
- Rich countries should not employ skilled labour from poor countries, as poor countries need the workers more.Do you agree or disagree. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 201, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'brings'?
Suggestion: brings
...des appear to be reasonable, I think it bring more disadvantages overall. On the o...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 198, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nstitution have a propensity to have the state-of-the-art medical facilities to a...
^^
Line 3, column 486, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: other
...usually render better services than any other other state-owned hospitals. For example, som...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 587, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...hospitals offer some outpatient services , post-operative consultations and hospit...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1686.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.26765799257 5.12529762239 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.4608847002 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591078066914 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2038524098 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.428571429 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2142857143 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317357042242 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119174868644 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669963481584 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20419302656 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334358860417 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 18.35 50.2224549098 37% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.09 12.4159519038 154% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.16 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.