Today the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, it is generally assumed that people’s lifestyle and spending habits are highly affected by various advertising tools. However, promotion campaigns may cause high sales and enormous profits for retailers, and even bring some benefits for consumers, it can be argued that these advertising tools impact the consumers much more than their real needs.
To begin, advertising does chase people on everyday base, and undoubtedly it has become a part of people’s lives. For example, advertising takes place on mobiles phones, on the TV, at the cinema, in the streets, in the subway and even in the restrooms of restaurants. Therefore, advertising is very hard to be escaped from and it may provoke a fake demand which can efficiently boost the great sales. Moreover, people are encouraged to buy the products and gadgets they do not really need or maybe even cannot afford. Unfortunately, people have strong beliefs that they will be much happier once they buy an advertised, very popular item.
Furthermore, children and young people are affected by advertising much more than adults. A sense of inferiority makes them adore the famous clothing brands or the latest models of mobile devices. While enormous pressure on parents makes them buy the unneeded goods again and again.
It is certainly true to say that advertising is being an engine of a successful trade today. Many consumer goods are sold in huge quantities despite that they are not on demand. In conclusion, many aspects of advertising do appear to have more influence on people in the future. That is why the trade business will be guided by advertising, and not by the real needs of consumers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-12 | khanhptk162 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-27 | Tahmid Rakin Siddiqui | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-27 | Tahmid Rakin Siddiqui | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-27 | Shahrear59 | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-10 | Dele Omo | 73 | view |
- Some of the methods used in advertising are unethical and unacceptable in today’s society.To what extent do you agree with this view? 73
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 61
- Some of the methods used in advertising are unethical and unacceptable in today’s society.To what extent do you agree with this view?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.Write at least 250 78
- Air traffic is increasingly leading to more noise, pollution, and airport construction. One reason for this is the growth in low-cost passenger flights, often to holiday destinations. Some people say that government should try to reduce air traffic by tax 78
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mers much more than their real needs. To begin, advertising does chase people ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...buy an advertised, very popular item. Furthermore, children and young people a...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y the unneeded goods again and again. It is certainly true to say that adverti...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, really, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1402.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09818181818 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80220456306 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592727272727 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.315300087 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.142857143 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6428571429 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199322132814 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648394787914 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404728704168 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114830636592 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533337596647 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.