Some people believe government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The realm of tackling traffic congestion is one in which there is a fair degree of controversy. It is the opinion of this writer that the facts are on the side of those who believe broadening the road is the more suitable way to reduce traffic jam compared to developing railway systems.
Those who are in favor of innovating train networks point to an approach not only deals with traffic congestion but also becomes an environmentally friendly measure. It cannot be denied that in this day and age, everyone needs their personal vehicles for easier transportation. This phenomenon results in environmental degradation owing to the large amount of exhaust fumes released. Therefore, train networks and other means of public transportation development, which can cut down on emissions, should be a top priority for every government.
There is a different point of view which holds that building more boulevards helps people move conveniently on roads. The explanation is that this project will create more spaces for vehicles which reduce traffic jam and accidents. It should also be mentioned that the construction of roads allow residents to reach their destinations faster since there will be more routes to choose. A valuable example in this regard is VietNam as its new highways help the nation with comfortabble transportaion during rush hours.
Thus, it can be seen that although there are those who point to a project can deal with both traffic congestion and pollution, clearer heads refer to a measure aiming to make citizens' transportation much more convenient. Therefore, it should have been abundantly demonstrated that the construction of new roads is highly recommended.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | Thang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | happyhappy | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-14 | MOHETH CHOWDARI | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-31 | Lynn2309 | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | Dao Thu Ha | 73 | view |
- Some people believe government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- In recent years, the family structure has changed as well as family roles. What types of changes are occurring? do you think these changes are positive or negative? 53
- khkklkl 11
- Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus. do you think this is a positive or negative development? 96
- In recent years, the family structure has changed as well as family roles. What types of changes are occurring? do you think these changes are positive or negative? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25461254613 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01840056257 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583025830258 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8987917598 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.666666667 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.83333333333 7.06120827912 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190373793965 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657597685709 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559083237397 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119143122262 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516436543537 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.