The article states that birds are confused and injuries when they try to fly through the glass windows and provide three possible solution to prevent the injuries. However, the professor in listening section refutes each point of solution. sometime bird get confused from that solution.
First, the reading claims if we replace regular glass to one way glass that is transparent in one direction, because birds are not able to see through the windows. However, the lecture argue that one way glass are act like a mirror that not reduce the injuries. Furthermore, the professor stats that when bird see through the one way glass it see the reflection of other element, for example when one way direction glass reflect tree birds don't detach the reflecting and go through them.
Secondly, the reading makes the argument that colorful or designs on regular window can demotivated birds to fly through them. The lecturer contrast this point by stating it also problematic to to reduce the bird injury. because when bird see the stripes line or design they think blank area my be hole that's why they try to fly through the hole. when windows are design that reduce the light for the resident.
Finally, The reading says that bird are fallow magnetic field that why create artificial magnetic to divert birds from the glass area. However, the lecture refute this point by saying that birds only use earth magnetic area to navigate one area to another long distance not for short distance. that not reduce the injuries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 241, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Sometime
...section refutes each point of solution. sometime bird get confused from that solution. ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'sees'?
Suggestion: sees
...n bird see through the one way glass it see the reflection of other element, for ex...
^^^
Line 3, column 441, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... way direction glass reflect tree birds dont detach the reflecting and go through th...
^^^^
Line 5, column 192, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...is point by stating it also problematic to to reduce the bird injury. because when bi...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...oblematic to to reduce the bird injury. because when bird see the stripes line or desig...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 293, Rule ID: MY_BE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'may be' or 'might be'?
Suggestion: may be; might be
...es line or design they think blank area my be hole thats why they try to fly through ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 304, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...design they think blank area my be hole thats why they try to fly through the hole. w...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 348, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...s why they try to fly through the hole. when windows are design that reduce the ligh...
^^^^
Line 7, column 295, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: That
...r long distance not for short distance. that not reduce the injuries.
^^^^
Line 7, column 325, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...distance. that not reduce the injuries.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1266.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 256.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9453125 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28732869492 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.50390625 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 382.5 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.116997792494 855% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9206171164 49.2860985944 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3846153846 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6923076923 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23076923077 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 4.19205298013 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.538242809076 0.272083759551 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.181760527725 0.0996497079465 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113783449477 0.0662205650399 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.311599442604 0.162205337803 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638958129168 0.0443174109184 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.