Nowadays many parents believe that children's usage of tablets or computers would be good for their future academic career.
What are the advantage and disadvantage of such belief. Give reasons for your answer and include an relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.
It is well said that, "today's children are future of tomorrow". Presently, a large number of parents asserts that the utlization of mobile phones and computers is supposed to be lucrative for adolescents in their future. Here, i would like account for merits and demerits with my own perceptions.
There are multifarious pros of using tablets by teenagers. First and foremost, children can become more frequent and brilliant if they use mobile phones in their life for study purpose. To illustrate, they can attain huge knowledge from the computers related to their education. As a result, tablets and computers could be fruitful for teenagers in their future. Besides this, off springs are able to use internet on mobile phones and therefore it is worthwhile idea for pupils to use tablets for their study.
There are also few drawbacks of using computers. Firstly, sometime teenagers misuse the computers and tablets. To illustrate, they spend their quality time in front of computer screen to play games and watching movies. Consequently, they lose their health standard such as eyesight weak and become stressful. What is more, Children cannot perform well in their study if they use more than limit and therefore it would be not good in their future.
From my notion, both sides have their own significance. Undeniably, excessive use of computers spoil the future of off springs. However, usage of tablets in a limit play a magnificent role in overall development of teenagers and therefore adolescents should use computers to be remain in limit.
To recapitulate, in this 21 century, it is necessary for a student to have a knowledge about computers and tablets so that it would be significant for their future academic.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-08 | mary.ssherr | 89 | view |
| 2019-06-06 | prajwal mukkawar | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 86, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...re future of tomorrow'. Presently, a large number of parents asserts that the utlization of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 238, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... for adolescents in their future. Here, i would like account for merits and demer...
^
Line 3, column 493, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...orthwhile idea for pupils to use tablets for their study. There are also few d...
^^
Line 5, column 287, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ir health standard such as eyesight weak and become stressful. What is more, Chil...
^^
Line 9, column 175, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... significant for their future academic.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, such as, as a result, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18021201413 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87469241132 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530035335689 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.414718618 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2352941176 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6470588235 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05882352941 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273348353636 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090638145806 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544551099034 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169140345561 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398833657521 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.