The chart below gives information about the most common sports played in New Zealand in 2002.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart compares the popularity of nine various types of sports in New Zealand in the year 2002.
Overall, the most played sport by girls was netball while boys preferred playing soccer rather than the other sports.
Almost 25% of girls enjoyed playing betball, compared to only about 1% of boys. One of the most played sport by boys was soccer with the parcitipation of nearly 25%, while the percentage of girls taking part in this sport was approximately 5%. In comparision to nearly 23% of girls whii participated in swimming, the figure for boys stood at under 15%. The proportion of boys choosing other sports was under 20% while only about 10% of girls decided to play other sports.
The five sports remained in the list were less common than the sports mentioned. Boys crossed the girls in cricket and marital arts with considerable difference, by about 10% and 8% respectively. In basketball and tennis, the proportion of boys playing was little higher thanh the figures for girls with minimal margin of 2 to 3%. More girls participated in athletics than boys. The figures for girls and boys playing this sport were 5% and 4% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-19 | dhq.testbig | 11 | view |
| 2021-12-03 | trangthang | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-05 | Harkirat123 | 73 | view |
| 2020-12-01 | Jango Jo | 67 | view |
| 2020-08-28 | haihapham2k | 50 | view |
- In developing countries, children in rural communities have less access to education. Some people believe that the problem can be solved by providing more schools and teachers, while others think that the problem can be solved by provi 73
- The chart below gives information about the most common sports played in New Zealand in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
- The line graph below shows the percantage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.Summarise the information by selactig and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The chart below gives information about the most common sports played in New Zealand in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- the graph shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks betweem 1978 and 2009 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...his sport were 5% and 4% respectively.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 968.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88888888889 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57815792295 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505050505051 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.1368778237 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.18181818182 5.23603664747 23% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146752080473 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692590539821 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502585373873 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116769731677 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358870131093 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.