The reading and the lecture both are discussing about the pterosaurs which want to know whether they were be able to fly or had a capability of glide. The author of the reading believes that they could not move with powered fight and the lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article. She thinks that they could fly b flapping their wings.
First of all, the passage claims that they are cold-blooded and because their metabolism were slow they could not produce energy. The professor contradicts this statement by saying that some fossil discovery of pterosaurs indicates that they had dense hair which covered them and it was similar to the fur. Also, they could maintain their temperature of their body high when the weather of their surrounding was cold. So the could supply energy in order to flying.
Secondly, the author states that they could not fly since they were heavy. The lecturer rejects this idea by explaining that their anatomical feature was unusual and they could sustain their boy light. They had hollow in their bone and that hollow kept their body low. So they were enough low to be able to flying their wings.
Thirdly, the author mentions that those animals who can fly are the capability of taking off. The lecturer oppose this idea by saying that there is a difference between birds and pterosaurs. Birds walk on ground by two limbs,however pteroaurs walk by four limbs. So They were able to fly.
- TPO-47 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 87
- Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. 60
- Do you agree or disagree technology has made children life less creative than in the past. support your answer with reasons and examples. 70
- TPO-14 - Integrated Writing Task Every year, forest fires and severe storms cause a great deal of damage to forests in the northwestern United States. One way of dealing with the aftermath of these disasters is called salvage logging, which is the practic 81
- Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed (damaged) by human activity. Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 107, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...rs which want to know whether they were be able to fly or had a capability of glid...
^^
Line 2, column 307, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...red them and it was similar to the fur. Also they could maintain their temperature o...
^^^^
Line 4, column 107, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'opposes'.
Suggestion: opposes
... capability of taking off. The lecturer oppose this idea by saying that there is a dif...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 224, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , however
...saurs. Birds walk on ground by two limbs,however, pteroaurs walk by four limbs. So They ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 22.412803532 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1189.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 249.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77510040161 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3246109497 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530120481928 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 348.3 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.9073051176 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.2666666667 110.228320801 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6 21.698381199 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.06666666667 7.06452816374 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261099157113 0.272083759551 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104246569832 0.0996497079465 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701522398263 0.0662205650399 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168549725467 0.162205337803 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0294506909313 0.0443174109184 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.3589403974 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 53.8541721854 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.42419426049 86% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.