tpo22
Both the reading and lecture are about Ethanol fuel which is made by corn and sugar cane. The reading provides three reasons that Ethanol cannot supersede gasoline. The lecture casts doubt on the claims made in the article. The professor finds all arguments unconvincing.
First of all, the author of reading states that Ethanol is able to create some troubles for environment such as global warming because when it burns; a huge amount of carbon dioxide can enter to atmosphere like gasoline. This point is challenged by the lecturer. He points out that since Ethanol is obtained by corn and other types of plants; hence, the carbon dioxide will be attracted by such plants. The professor elaborates on this by mentioning that the plants require carbon dioxide as a part of their nutrition; consequently, the released carbon dioxide by Ethanol, can remove from air through the flora.
Secondly, the article contends that for producing Ethanol, producers need to cut a huge mass of plants. It goes without saying that animals rely on flora for their diet, so cutting plants can create severe and negative impacts on animals' life. This argument is rebutted by the professor. He expresses that Ethanol is gained through cellulose which is a main component of plant and also it is located in plant’s cell-wall. One should know that this part of plant is not eaten by animals; subsequently, this reason is not acceptable.
Finally, the reading passage proposed that the price of Ethanol will not be able to compete with gasoline because the tax subsidies for producing Ethanol is very high for the United State government and they can stop assisting to companies which collaborate to replace Ethanol with gasoline; conversely, the lecturer believes that such a great support is always required by producers. If they have enough budget for this purpose, they would boost their products; as a result, being available of Ethanol's products will cause the Ethanol's price to reduce even to 45 percentage.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 225, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...oubt on the claims made in the article. The professor finds all arguments unconvinc...
^^^
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...n create severe and negative impacts on animals life. This argument is rebutted by the ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, conversely, finally, first, hence, if, second, secondly, so, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1677.0 1373.03311258 122% => OK
No of words: 330.0 270.72406181 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08181818182 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59960617205 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560606060606 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 419.366225166 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 87.9423043187 49.2860985944 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.8 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.438656093757 0.272083759551 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124860170507 0.0996497079465 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101978386796 0.0662205650399 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251049971638 0.162205337803 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0958048985973 0.0443174109184 216% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.