Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take

Essay topics:

Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.

Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.

In modern society, university education is regarded as increasingly important for people \'s career and future success, making more students eagering to getting in to it. This also natually led to the problem of funding for some families. Some people contend that governments should offer free university education for all those who have been admitted but cannot afford the costs. I partly agree with the statement, which ensures equal rignts for everyone to receive education. However, this can also lead to problems like budgets and discrimination.

Foremost, one of the tasks of modern government is to make sure that important social resources are not restricted to a certain social classes, including eduction. In fact, equal right to receive education is one of the many characteristics of a modern society. This is also why many countries, including China, is making primary and middle school education free for every citizen. And this can be readily applied to higher education. When the rights to attend universities is marred by the inequality in fortune, it is definitely the time for the government to stand out. If this was not the case, then education would be the prerogative of the rich and the powerful.

What is more, attending a university could be a life-changing opportunities for many, especially those from impecunious families. Letting poorer students study in universities also benefits society as a whole. University education makes its graduates better prepared for more lucrative jobs, which can narrow the gap between the rich and the poor and can falicitate social mobility, on condition that they share the same opportunity to study in a university campus. Although the outcome in eliminating poverty is almost indiscernible in short term, but this endeavor undoubtably making the future of poorer youngsters more competitive and more prosperous in the long-run .

Nonetheless, unconditionally supporting all the students who cannot afford the tuition at universities can also lead to a wealth of problems. For instance, the tuition in America universities is so high that it would be a heavy burden on the budget for governments. Imaginably, this could lead to dissatisfaction among richer tax-payers, further deepening discrimination and misunderstanding between the rich and the poor. In addition, as the expenditure for universities surges, they may increase the tuition fee for international students, which could result in losing some of the brightest brains in the world.

Due to aforementioned ground, patronizing poorer students for their university education is absolutely a responsibility for governments, but providing help for all of the students who could not afford the tuition could lead to undesired consequences both in universities and in society.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-07-08 majduleen 75 view
2018-07-08 majduleen 66 view
2017-06-19 Pattern 79 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Pattern :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 136, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'classis'?
Suggestion: classis
... are not restricted to a certain social classes, including eduction. In fact, equal rig...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 671, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...tive and more prosperous in the long-run . Nonetheless, unconditionally support...
^^
Line 9, column 161, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...for governments, but providing help for all of the students who could not afford the tuiti...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, nonetheless, so, then, for instance, in addition, in fact, in short, what is more

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2373.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 435.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45517241379 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19659526993 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51724137931 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 758.7 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.740449438202 270% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.6139874526 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.65 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273277477532 0.243740707755 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853024987942 0.0831039109588 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0890922366628 0.0758088955206 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174244969119 0.150359130593 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063604614359 0.0667264976115 95% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.