I agree that it is more joyful to have a job with three days a week for long hours in comparison with a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. I think this type of job helps people to improve quality of their lives and became more useful persons. I explain my opinion and reasons in following:
First, it has been proved in social sciences that travelling and meeting new countries and cities could help people in several aspects. They meet different cultures, learn different languages and their spirits will be improved by releasing their daily stress and being apart from their hometown. The job with three day work makes more two free days for people and in other words they have four days weekend which are an ideal time to travel diverse destinations.
In other point, people who spend time with their family are much happy in comparison with those do not. In this case people feel they are responsible parents or spouses because of being with their beloved persons more and it transforms positive energy contributing with loyalty and trust in their home which could results in happiness and joyfulness of people.
Third, people can spend much more time for their interest and improve their knowledge and skills. They can learn music, cooking or doing sports and this makes them pleased because they answer to their childhood interest. Some people can continue their educational career or learn another language. All these activities improve people's personality and help them to be happy and hopeful to future.
In conclusion this is a debatable subject in human resource management and it is not been approved yet which type of job is suitable for everyone however I think the benefits of three work-days job is much more its disadvantages.
- TPO16:Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 81
- computers make life easier 85
- TPO-27 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying.Use specific reasons and ex 67
- TPO-17 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Most advertisements make products seem much better then they really are.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'tripped'.
Suggestion: tripped
...end you have four days in a row to have trip, staying at home with family, reading b...
^^^^
Line 5, column 75, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...ays in a week helps you to have another part time job and earn much money. For example a ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 195, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'job' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'jobs'.
Suggestion: jobs
...I think the benefits of three work-days job is much more its disadvantages.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, so, third, for example, i think, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1290.0 1977.66487455 65% => OK
No of words: 301.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.28571428571 4.8611393121 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37228489554 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 212.727598566 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485049833887 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 407.7 618.680645161 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.756067872 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.272727273 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3636363636 20.6045352989 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.27272727273 5.45110844103 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.581988284656 0.236089414692 247% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.270922631929 0.076458572812 354% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154999021112 0.0737576698707 210% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.380031335407 0.150856017488 252% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.171967904056 0.0645574589148 266% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 58.1214874552 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.9 10.9000537634 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 86.8835125448 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.