Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for the government to spend money on new buildings than to preserve historic or traditional buildings and homes.
The expense how the government spends is an important issue for the country. Some may think that it is worthy to spend money on new investment such as new buildings, while others may support that the money should spend on maintain historic buildings. In my opinion, it is more significant for the government to preserve traditional architecture.
First of all, historic buildings represent the culture of a country which is critical for the government. A well-preserved old structure and appearance can present how the government evaluate the value of the culture of their country. It costs money to have these preservation. If a government not puts efforts on maintaining the historic architecture, it may be regarded as not respect to their culture. Therefore, it is important for the government to spend money on sustaining traditional buildings.
Secondly, the government can spend less money on preserve historic buildings than on new buildings. Budget is always the critical factor of the government. Imaging that building a new construction needs to include the cost of design, materials and labors; it may also produce pollution and noisy. On the contrast, preserving traditional building only need awesome technicians who may cost not much than build a whole building. It is clear that which decision can save budget which is significant for the government.
Last but not least, preserving the historic building can enhance the growth of economic. Tourism industry is a great and crucial element of a country. With the famous historic building, people are more willing to travel to the country which is beneficial to the government. Take my experience for example, there is always a travel itinerary to visit historic buildings whenever I join a tour group. It can briefly illustrate that why preserving historic buildings is more important for the government.
In conclusion, it is more important for government to spend money on preserving historic buildings than new ones. Not only because of the aspect of culture remaining but also on the reason of the economics.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for the government to spend money on new buildings than to preserve historic or traditional buildings and homes. 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The ability to maintain a small number of friends for a long time is more important to happiness than the ability to make new friends easily. 60
- Agree or disagree people should not spend a lot of time on communicating by technologies such as through social media or with text message 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The ability to maintain a small number of friends for a long time is more important to happiness than the ability to make new friends easily. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'thinks'.
Suggestion: thinks
...portant issue for the country. Some may think that it is worthy to spend money on new...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this preservation' or 'these preservations'?
Suggestion: this preservation; these preservations
...f their country. It costs money to have these preservation. If a government not puts efforts on ma...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1758.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 334.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26347305389 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02253479563 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 212.727598566 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.452095808383 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 531.0 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.1879114879 48.9658058833 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.9 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3 5.45110844103 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.462339459713 0.236089414692 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154148940161 0.076458572812 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13647518267 0.0737576698707 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.297227247583 0.150856017488 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461399153516 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.