The maps show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010.
The given maps summarize some significant changes in the village of Stokeford from 1930 to 2010. Overall, the village had become more residential over the surveyed period while the main road system still stayed the same.
One of the major changes to Stokeford village between 1930 and 2010 was the removal of 2 large areas used for farming in the northeast and southwest of the main road. In their places, in 2010, a number of houses had been built. On the right of the road, there was a large house in the middle of huge gardens, which was converted into a retirement home with less area of gardens. To the north of the retirement home, there was a primary school whose only renovation was an expansion with 2 more buildings included. On the other side of the road, in 1930, Stookeford had 2 shops, which were both torn down to make room for the increasing number of people choosing to live in the village. Throughout the years, various changes had occurred to Stokeford, but the bridge, the river, and the post office still remained through it all, witnessing the development of the village.
- As the number of cars increases more money has to be spent on road systems Some people think the government should pay for this Others however think the drivers should cover the costs Discuss both views and give your opinion 90
- The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
- The diagram shows how geothermal energy is used to produced electricity 72
- The graph below gives information about the price of bananas in four countries between 1994 and 2004 67
- The graph shows the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 904.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68393782383 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44219048059 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59067357513 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1629209202 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 5.23603664747 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241255151357 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117316123382 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148553282688 0.0843802449381 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232284340783 0.15604864568 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0906730949877 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.