The table denotes a number of mobile phones which were sold all over the world by distinctive trademarks in two years. A number of sales indicates in the percentage with the name of companies by horizontal rows. The vertical column shows the years with percentage symbol on it.
Now turning to the detail, it is likely that the highest sales were on Nokia markets during 2005 and 2006 when Motorola mobile phones were produced at 17 % in the first year and the following year soared to 4%. In 2006 other types of phones were demanded less at 16% prior to point 19 % in 2005. Samsung company was less elastic between 2005 and 2006 with 12 %.
On the other hand, L.G, BenQ Mobile phones were accounted less producers or the least at 6 % in both years. The calculations showed a total proportion with hundredfold.
Overall, by looking at the two-year-market stocks Nokia products were at the peak in percentage white comparison with BenQ Mobile company products were bought at the lowest.
- Convenience food will become increasingly prevalent and eventually replace traditional foods and traditional methods of food preparation. To what degree do you agree or disagree? 89
- The chart shows student expenditure over a three-year period in the United Kingdom. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. You should write at least 150 words. 73
- The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999. 78
- The bar chart below gives information about the percentage of the population living in urban areas in the world and in different continents Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 91
- The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufactures in the years 2005 and 2006. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 21, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: G
...d 2006 with 12 %. On the other hand, L.G, BenQ Mobile phones were accounted less...
^
Line 3, column 58, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun producers is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... L.G, BenQ Mobile phones were accounted less producers or the least at 6 % in both y...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, look, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 817.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80588235294 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56368868424 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594117647059 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.9484485687 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7777777778 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2508758381 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101651517362 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632762561264 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145528934752 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0672198700015 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.