Although the author provides three main hypotheses to support the idea that Edmontosaurus were used to migrate in harsh climate of Np towards South every winter, the professor finds them dubious and brings up some counter reasons to refute them all.
Firstly, the author claims that these animals were plant eaters and fed on vegetable. So in order to find more food resources, they might have migrated to the places such south that were more likely to find food. However, the professor states that a million years ago, the summers in North Pole were warm enough that the summers were 24-hour-sunshine. The condition was proper to thrive plentiful vegetable and plants. In winter these plants died and they could readily use dead plants up and survive in harsh climate.
Secondly, the author states that as long as moving in herd means good orientation for migration, this would have let them to migrate in herds since lots of fossils of these large animals have been dug out and indicated the fact that they lived together. According to the professor there are some possible reasons that animals live and move together in the same land and one of them is keeping themselves safe from being prey by predators. For instance, some large plant eater such as a kind of elk live in herd but do not migrate. Thus, it is more unlikely that they moved in groups.
Eventually, the author argues that they were fast enough to reach the warmer places. Conversely, the professor asserts that this is true that they had the ability to run fast to reach their destinations, but it was true about the adult animals not juveniles and younger dinosaurs. Not only did they slow the speed of herd but also the adults could not leave them alone and keep up their ways. Thus, they could not migrate in harsh climate.
- TPO 47 Writing IntegratedPterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered whether 76
- TOPIC Imagine that you plan to donate money to charity to help people in need If you could give money to only one type of charitable organization which one of the following would you choose and why An organization that provides food and housing to people 80
- Integrated writing - TPO 51 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Some people prefer to get up early in the morning and start the day’s work. Others prefer to get up later in the day and work until late at night. Which one do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for instance, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 313.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7731629393 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33320039148 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 145.348785872 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552715654952 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.7978118239 49.2860985944 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.714285714 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3571428571 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294193832365 0.272083759551 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0973534078295 0.0996497079465 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565474915225 0.0662205650399 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170704153966 0.162205337803 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521171341133 0.0443174109184 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 53.8541721854 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.