The reading and the lecture are about a European silver coin which some people believe that they were carried by Norse who settled from Europe to North America. In the reading, the author provides three important reasons why some scholars think that the coin is not a real historical evidence. However, the professor disputes all of the assumptions made in the reading.
First of all, the place the coin was found was far away from where the Norse people lived is the argument of the writer. The lecturer proves it as a false theory. He avers that Norse people used to travel different place, and they liked to keep many interesting things with them. For example, as the professor says there were many different archeological things were found at that site which indicates that Norse people travel from North America to Canada. So, this coin has historical evidence.
Secondly, the writer claims that as no other coin was found at the site where Norse people settled so it must be a historical fake thing. On the other hand, the professor said that it does not mean that Norse people didn't carry silver coin. He also says that Norse people did not stay very long time at Canada and they might be taken everything along themselves when they left the country to their country, Europe.
Thirdly, the reading said that as the Norse people knew that there was no value of the silver coin to North Americans, they did not bring them. However. The professor refutes this point by saying that even though there was no monetary value of the silver coin that time, the Norse people knew that NA people like ostension things and they brought the silver coin to trade with North American people.
- TPO 19 - Integrated TOEFL essay 73
- Tpo 24 q2One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part time job 70
- It is more important for universities to invest in infrastructure and physical plant than to invest in keeping the faculty satisfied. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-25 Integrated WritingIn 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line. The vessel was about 2,200 years old. Each clay jay contained a copper cylinder surr 80
- TPO-49 Integrated taskLike many creatures, humpback whales migrate long distances for feeding and mating purposes. How animals manage to migrate long distances is often puzzling. In the case of humpback whales, we may have found the answer: they may be na 66
Low 'paragraph topic
Low 'paragraph topic coherence SD' means 'paragraphs are similar to each other'. Some words or contents are duplicated. For integrated task, this is not a big issue. You can ignore it.
Need to pay attention to other issues, look:
Unique words percentage: 0.505084745763 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
difficult_words: 43.0 63.6247240618 68% => More difficult words wanted.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 327, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...idence. However, the professor disputes all of the assumptions made in the reading. Fi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 327, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ample, as the professor says there were many different archeological things were found at that...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 217, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...that it does not mean that Norse people didnt carry silver coin. He also says that No...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 145, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...rth Americans, they did not bring them. However. The professor refutes this point by sa...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, for example, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1398.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 295.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73898305085 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.15355374612 2.5805825403 83% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505084745763 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 426.6 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7435116795 49.2860985944 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.538461538 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.30769230769 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.468409903848 0.272083759551 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.181275245738 0.0996497079465 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.097715535755 0.0662205650399 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.309122354872 0.162205337803 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.021254110603 0.0443174109184 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 53.8541721854 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 8.42419426049 83% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 63.6247240618 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.