Educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Perhaps, most universities and colleges may think about this idea as a way to accept only talented students which, hence, will be beneficial for these educational establishments. Although, I strongly disagree with the statement above, and think that such institutions have to give a chance for all students equally.
First of all, I would like to refer to the history and show how the suggested idea can have a negative impact on the entire society. It is easy to find some examples of prominent scientists which had not showed any interest in the field they became famous in. For instance, Albert Einstein was not a top student at school, moreover, he had problems with physics. Although, we all know him as the person who created one of the base theories in understanding the coloration between time and space. Thus, if once the school had made him quit classes, this theory would probably have never been opened.
Moreover, it is unfair to deprive a person of a chance to receive a good education if he is currently not a student showing perspective. The chance must be equal for all students regardless of their previous success. For example, a student might have had problems with the future pursuing field, because he did not have a lot of chances to evolve in it. A student can be from a poor family who cannot afford to buy a PC, but, indeed, this student will be good at programming if he has needed resources for his self-development.
Moreover, hard-work is what can bring success in the future. A prospective student can have a low mark or GPA, because he did not know why he needed to have good ones. Then, one day he could realize he would like to get a bachelor's degree in a field. He changed his mind and would work harder in the future to improve his knowledge.
Thus, I do not agree that educational institutions have to dissuade students; otherwise, they have to encourage them to study even if students have some problems with their education.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jenniferjack07 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | lanhhoang | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | lanhhoang | 16 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | AkkineniAnuhya4 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | maneesha ch | 50 | view |
- In an attempt to improve highway safety, Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways. But this effort has failed: the number of accidents has not decreased, and, based on reports by the highway patro 63
- If you could change one important thing about your hometown what would you change Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Sometimes it is better not to tell the truth Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 77
- University should require every graduation students to take public speaking courses Give examples and details to support your answer 88
- Educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and su 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, may, moreover, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 345.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73333333333 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73619196728 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559420289855 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6089876295 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.0625 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5625 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8125 5.21951772744 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126245205537 0.243740707755 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0435991066361 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037187812583 0.0758088955206 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.079883241471 0.150359130593 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368638399454 0.0667264976115 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.