The charts give information on how people used flight facilities, including airlines and different kinds of aspects, had satisfaction between 1999 and 2007.
Firstly, the graph indicates that occupations which associated with national airlines, were highly satisfied. In 1999, satisfactory performance sent 65% and then rose slightly to 72% in 2007, while the quantity of dissatisfied clients went down over the same period.
As is presented in the table chart, the complaisance of passengers and staff acquired high levels of satisfaction according to data, reaching about 90% on average for each year. In addition, there was a gradual increase in satisfaction in the case of ticket prices, which is followed by 45% at first, then ascended to 65% in 2007, while schedules remained fairly stable over a period almost last-7 years. Interestingly, only 47% of travelers felt comfortable with seats provided by data in 2007.
Overall, what stands out from the charts reveal that the degree of satisfaction came up steadily as well as specific ingredients of flying experience in which they had an upward trend during the whole time.
- The chart and table below show customer satisfaction levels in the US with airlines and aspects of air travel in 1999 2000 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 90
- To learn effectively children need to eat a healthy meal at school How true is this statement Whose responsibility is it to provide food for school children 72
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 95
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 11
- The Table and the Bar chart below give information about travelling to work in Houston, Texas. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, so, then, well, while, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 959.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32777777778 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89897278529 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.722222222222 0.547539520022 132% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1884941108 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.0 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7142857143 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 5.23603664747 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173687393676 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743082477138 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451210555698 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0969245479626 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503861180349 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.