The following appeared in a letter from a firm providing investment advice to a client. “Homes in the northeastern United States, where winters are typically cold, have traditionally used oil as their major fuel for heating. Last year that region experienced twenty days with below-average temperatures, and local weather forecasters throughout the region predict that this weather pattern will continue for several more years. Furthermore, many new homes have been built in this region during the past year. Because of these developments, we predict an increased demand for heating oil and recommend investment in Consolidated Industries, one of whose major business operations is the retail sale of home heating oil.”
In the above statement, it is advised by an investment firm to a client to invest in Consolidated Industries (Manufacturer of heating oil) due to typically cold temperatures and possibility of increase of demand of heating oil. The investment firm based their assumptions on two pieces of facts. While it is possible that the stated assumptions are true it is based on dubious currency and may or may not be valid. Therefore, the client needs to further address questions about its possible flaws.
The first area of deficit is that the investment firm erroneously believes that the major fuel for heating has stayed stagnant and is still being used as a possible heating element. It might be possible that due to technological advancements homes in the northeastern have adopted a different and efficient kind of fuel. If this is true, it would seriously weaken the investment firm argument.
Furthermore, the investment firm injudiciously assumes and advices the client to invest in Consolidated Industries. Even if oil is yet used as a traditional element for heating, there is no piece of evidence to cite that the heating element demand would be balanced by Consolidated Industries. The homes in northeastern United States may opt for a different company due to various reasons which includes price and availability. The investment firm needs to thoroughly research the market and cite a valid piece of evidence to support their argument.
Moreover, the Investment firm based their assumptions for increase in demand independently on the fate of weather forecasts. There is a possibility that the weather forecast may be inaccurate or the decrease in temperatures may be due to a storm present within the north eastern region. The firm needs to confirm the validity of the data as it may be flawed. It would be unlikely that the demand would increase and the client might incur a loss.
Finally, the statement supports that many new houses have been built within the region during the past year. However, there is no corroboration to demonstrate that residents are residing within the house. It may as all be possible that the company who developed the houses have been unable to sell them or maybe it’s owned by the rich elites who prefer to use in during the summer. If this is the scenario, investing in heating oil is unlikely to help and the demand may not even increase.
In conclusion, there are many aspects and questions that the Investment firm needs to address before the client can go ahead with the venture. They need to access the validity of the weather forecast to the actual demand and status of the fuel. If compelling evidence is provided the statement will immeasurably strengthen. However, if not the statement will fall apart.
- "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies 29
- The following appeared in a letter from a firm providing investment advice to a client. “Homes in the northeastern United States, where winters are typically cold, have traditionally used oil as their major fuel for heating. Last year that region experi 75
Comments
Essay evaluation report
argument 1 -- OK
argument 2 -- OK
argument 3 -- not OK. we may argue: maybe there are even more days with above-average temperatures.
argument 4 -- OK
--------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 23 15
No. of Words: 460 350
No. of Characters: 2253 1500
No. of Different Words: 197 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.631 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.898 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.815 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 161 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 123 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 88 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 56 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.841 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.783 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.298 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.533 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.065 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 246, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e actual demand and status of the fuel. If compelling evidence is provided the sta...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, then, therefore, while, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.6327345309 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.9520958084 139% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 11.1786427146 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 13.6137724551 103% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 28.8173652695 97% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 55.5748502994 104% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 16.3942115768 128% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2314.0 2260.96107784 102% => OK
No of words: 460.0 441.139720559 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03043478261 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.56307096286 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8869499738 2.78398813304 104% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 204.123752495 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.434782608696 0.468620217663 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 725.4 705.55239521 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.76447105788 103% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.70958083832 221% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 19.7664670659 116% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2541615949 57.8364921388 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.608695652 119.503703932 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 23.324526521 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95652173913 5.70786347227 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.20758483034 122% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.67664670659 150% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233007547716 0.218282227539 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669657714969 0.0743258471296 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471306190503 0.0701772020484 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12439015098 0.128457276422 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450627543343 0.0628817314937 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.3799401198 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.3550499002 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.5979740519 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.32208582834 98% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 98.500998004 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.