The main idea of both the reading passage and the lecture is about how agnostids may have lived. The reading passage provides several different theories. On the other hand, the professor rejects whatever mentioned in the passage.
First, the reading passage discusses that agnostids were free-swimming predators. Nevertheless, the professor refutes this point and states that free-swimming predators have excellent vision while agnostids had tiny eyes or they were blind. Unless they may have another organ which helped them to navigate prey. But their fossils have not shown such an organ.
Second, the reading passage discusses that agnostids may have dwelled on the seafloor. On the other hand, the professor rejects this point and states that seafloor dwellers did not have the ability to travel fast and far. They were lived in localized area. While agnostids were lived in various geographical areas.
Eventually, the reading passage discusses that agnostids were parasites. But the professor is against this and states that if agnostids were parasites, their populations were small. While vast fossils have shown that agnostids' populations were large.
All in all, the reading passage provides three reasons about how agnostids may have lived. On the other hand, the professor thinks that none of these is reasonable.
- If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying 70
- Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities 70
- Do you agree or disagree?One of the best way that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take apart-time job.Use specific reasons and examples. 73
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. 66
- Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'several'.
Suggestion: several
...ave lived. The reading passage provides several different theories. On the other hand, the profes...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 241, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Unless” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...stids had tiny eyes or they were blind. Unless they may have another organ which helpe...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 257, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...far. They were lived in localized area. While agnostids were lived in various geograp...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 182, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...arasites, their populations were small. While vast fossils have shown that agnostids ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, well, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 30.3222958057 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1125.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 206.0 270.72406181 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46116504854 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55419622801 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 145.348785872 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485436893204 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 340.2 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 21.2450331126 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.4445577033 49.2860985944 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.3125 110.228320801 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.875 21.698381199 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.8125 7.06452816374 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.27373068433 281% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.464255394213 0.272083759551 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178590837756 0.0996497079465 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0872229815647 0.0662205650399 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.292022162117 0.162205337803 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0931110384769 0.0443174109184 210% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 53.8541721854 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.2 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.5 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.498013245 65% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.