The table below gives information about the percentage of land covered by forest in various countries in 1990 and 2005 with estimated figures for 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The table sheds the light on the proportion of forest covered land in different countries between the years 1990 and 2005 and gives a projection towards 2015.
Overall, Brazil had the highest percentage in all years, while Chile and Australia had the lowest. Unfortunately, Australia and Brazil showed a decrease in their percentages over time. However, New Zealand and Chile improved the areas filled by forest.
First of all, Although Brazil had a falling in the numbers of lands covered by forest over the years; from 62.2% in 1990 to 57.2% in 2005 and to an estimated percentage of 53.5% in 2015, it did manage to stay in the first place among the other three countries. On the other hand, in 1990, Chile had the smallest area of only 20.4%. However, in 2005 Chile managed to improve its percentage by 0.9%, which made Australia become the lowest in percentage in that year with only 21.3%.
Fortunately, New Zealand showed the biggest improvement over the years, from 28.8% to 31.0% with a projection to reach 32.3% in 2015, that kept it in the second place among those four countries over a period of a decade and a half.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-07 | nle2006 | 74 | view |
| 2022-08-15 | kavi jk | 56 | view |
| 2020-05-10 | Bella.pham | 67 | view |
| 2018-12-19 | Huyen My | 41 | view |
| 2017-10-24 | thefirst25 | 83 | view |
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal.Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally importantfor a country. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Give reasonsfor your answer and inc 61
- Nowadays artificial intelligence is being used to drive cars Why is this happening Is this a good or bad development 46
- Some teachers think that international student exchange would be beneficial for all teenage school students Do you think its advantages will outweigh the disadvantages 60
- Some teachers think that international student exchange would be beneficial for all teenage school students Do you think its advantages will outweigh the disadvantages 65
- Beside alot of advantages, some people believe that the internet creates many problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, while, first of all, in the first place, in the second place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 942.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78172588832 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47885229523 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532994923858 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.9980751543 43.030603864 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.75 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.625 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.375 5.23603664747 255% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188653307007 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842190875565 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753081104461 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12837380572 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0850622022236 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.