TPO29
The reading specifies that there are three argument to support the migration hypothesis of edmontosaurs. However, the professor explains that this arguments are not convinicing and refutes each of author's reasons.
First, reading states that Edmontosaur fed on plants and its diet support the idea that they migrate. Nevertheless, the speaker say that the Edmontosaurs do not need to migrate because in the pase the weather was warmer and during the summer sunshine help vegetation to grow up and when winter comes, the Edmontosaurs could use the nutrient of this dead vegetation. Hence, they could easily live there.
Second, based on the reading, the fact that Edmontosaurs live in herds support that they migrated. In contrast, the lecturer believes that there are many reasons to live in the herds and of this reason is for extera protection form predators and it is not necceary for them to migrate.
Third, according to reading, Edmonosaurs were physically capable of travel long distanes to reach hospitable regions. On the contrary, juvenile edmonosaurs could not migrate this long distances and also edmonosaurs do not leaver their juvenile in the cold weather. Therefore, whole herds of the edmontosaurs stay and live in that cold weather.
Therefore, the specifics points mentioned in the reading to not make sense.
- In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at a young age. 60
- tpo 33 71
- TPO 34 85
- Integrated tpo8 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement At universities and colleges sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 143, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...s. However, the professor explains that this arguments are not convinicing and refut...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, third, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1119.0 1373.03311258 81% => OK
No of words: 212.0 270.72406181 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27830188679 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77686800299 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 145.348785872 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556603773585 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 339.3 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4451427472 49.2860985944 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.727272727 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2727272727 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.54545454545 7.06452816374 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316854110267 0.272083759551 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10701828261 0.0996497079465 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622207856443 0.0662205650399 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140544696783 0.162205337803 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0892010493138 0.0443174109184 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.