sometimes we are assigned to work in a group on a project. do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
the group will be helped more by a person who will be willing to do what other group members want than by a person
who often strongly insists that things should be done in a way that is different from what the group wants to do
The question is whether a group would access its goals through a person who agrees with other members' opinions or a person who disagrees with all. Everyone in consideration to his private view point may maintain a specific direction toward this statement. Some believe that being unanimous with group and its members will provide a tranquil atmosphere for doing tasks while others have a conviction that if one disagrees with others, this means he is very courageous and relies on his own opinion, thus others should pursue the project through following his thoughts. My answer is similar to the first group, so the next paragraphs will vastly elucidate my vantage point through three salient reasons:
To begin with, one should not forget that main sake of prosperity in a group is that among members must be the peace because any conflict would have negative impacts on the young's performance. When a person opposes with a made decision by all members continuously, humans who attend in the group, may find a disgusting feeling about the projects; therefore, they were reluctant to collaborate in the group. The purposes will be left and even worse, the group may be disintegrated.
In addition, whenever a decision is made, as a matter a fact, all members are involved in it. It can be said that the best approach for achieving a solution by the group is that leader and others attempt to tender a list which includes positive and negative points about an issue. Finally, with evaluating those mentioned points and consulting, the best decision will be made. As the old saying goes that several hands can act more effective than one hand. Trusting on just a person and his idea may lead the project toward the failure.
Moreover, being stubborn and selfish destroys a balanced relationship. If one distracts other members frequently with refuting them, gradually people will prefer not to respect him and even they will not allow him to participate in the meetings. Needless to say this person's personality will be changed in a solitary way and he will not practice for being patient or respecting other humans.
To sum up, this conclusion could be drawn that if a leader wants his group to be success, he should notice all members' ideas and make a logical decisions. Admiring or following a man who disagrees with all, would remove the respect and peace.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 378, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ulting, the best decision will be made. As the old saying goes that several hands ...
^^
Line 7, column 268, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...e in the meetings. Needless to say this persons personality will be changed in a solita...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 304, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a solitary way" with adverb for "solitary"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...his persons personality will be changed in a solitary way and he will not practice for being pati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 145, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'decision'?
Suggestion: decision
...ce all members ideas and make a logical decisions. Admiring or following a man who disagr...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, in addition, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 9.8082437276 224% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1973.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 400.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9325 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61913034231 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5525 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.2894269681 48.9658058833 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.3125 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.425615697118 0.236089414692 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134579456438 0.076458572812 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810484352814 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23906892442 0.150856017488 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551156906483 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.